“Meta’s platforms have become a one-stop shop for wildlife criminals. The algorithms don’t just allow this trade — they fuel it. Meta can and must halt this illegal business now and be held accountable. Meta must now help reverse the damage from this illegal trade.” – Steven Galster, Founder, Freeland
A landmark investigative report released by a coalition of international conservation organizations provides damning evidence that Meta — the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger — hosts the largest known illegal wildlife marketplace in the world. The report, titled Clicks That Kill: Meta’s Algorithm of Extinction, documents how Meta’s own algorithms and monetization programs are not only failing to stop wildlife trafficking — they are actively promoting and amplifying it.
The report was produced by Freeland, PEGAS (Project to End Great Ape Slavery), International Wildlife Trust, Education for Nature Vietnam and Liberia Chimpanzee Rescue & Protection.
Wildlife trafficking on Meta platforms has been known for many years, but the scale of the trade has not been appreciated before this report and another one by ECO-SOLVE released just before it. The ECO-SOLVE report detected 21,904 advertisement posts on Facebook alone for 266,535 wildlife products between April 14, 2024 and March 1, 2026.
Many of the live animal and product posts are of African species. Meta forms the largest black-market bazaar in which African species are funnelled illegally to the world, contributing significantly to biodiversity loss and the severe loss of ‘wildlife power’ that drives essential ecosystem functions, which Patrol reported on earlier this year.
African species offered for sale openly on Facebook, the trafficker can ship anywhere. Cryptocurrency payment favours money laundering. Meta takes no action.
KEY FINDINGS
Meta hosts the world’s largest illegal wildlife black market. The researchers documented hundreds of accounts from dozens of countries openly trading live tigers, orangutans, chimpanzees, gorillas, elephants, rhinos, pangolins, and scores of other CITES-listed endangered species — and their bones, skins, meat, and organs — on Facebook and Instagram.
Meta ignores its own regulations and laws. This wildlife trade posts in most cases not only contravenes Meta’s own Community Standards and Commerce Policies, but it is illegal under national laws and CITES regulations.
Meta’s algorithms actively connect and reward wildlife traffickers. The report presents evidence that Meta’s recommendation algorithms direct users scrolling wildlife content toward other wildlife trafficker accounts, suggest wildlife criminals as “People You May Know,” and place commercial advertisements directly on trafficker profiles.
Meta has itself inserted a ‘People You May Know’ between two wildlife posts in a user’s Feed. The suggested accounts to befriend all trade wildlife.
Meta may be paying wildlife traffickers. Through its Content Monetization programs — including In-Stream Ads, Facebook Stars, and Creator Subscriptions — Meta is financially incentivizing content creators to maximize post volume. The report finds circumstantial evidence that wildlife traffickers are enrolled in Content Monetization programs, meaning Meta is potentially paying them to traffic endangered species. Meta takes a cut of the subscription income of the service that creators set up themselves.
Meta has dismantled its own enforcement capacity. In January 2025, Meta eliminated its independent fact-checkers. In March 2026, it announced the phaseout of human content moderators in favor of Artificial Intelligence. The report documents that despite Meta’s stated Community Standards prohibiting wildlife trade, warnings issued to trafficking accounts are routinely ignored — and traffickers whose accounts are suspended typically resume business on a new account within 24 hours.
Meta’s legal shield is wearing thin. Meta has relied on the U.S. Communications Decency Act Section 230 (CDA 230) to claim immunity from liability for third-party content. The report argues that Meta’s algorithmic promotion of traffickers, the high potential that it is monetizing trafficking content, and its guidance to content creators on maximizing engagement may constitute content creation — not mere hosting — eroding its CDA 230 protections. Furthermore, CDA 230 provides no protection under the laws of most other countries where Meta operates.
The public health stakes are real. The unrestricted trade of wild animals across borders without veterinary screening creates the conditions for zoonotic disease spillover. COVID-19, most likely originating from the unregulated wildlife trade, is cited as the clearest recent warning.
A wide variety of live wildlife and body parts can be found for sale on Meta platforms, almost all obtained from poaching and collecting.
Lip service
For years Meta has been issuing pledges to eliminate wildlife trade posts from its platforms, first with IFAW and later in 2018 after joining the Coalition to End Wildlife Trafficking Online. Most recently Meta was one of 11 tech companies pledging (again) to eliminate illegal wildlife listings online, this time in the context of the United for Wildlife Business Forum, convened by His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales.
The author met with Max Slackman in 2018 at the launch of the Coalition to End Wildlife Trafficking Online, who at the time was Facebook’s animal policies manager. We discussed what Facebook could do beyond simply removing posts or suspending accounts, which are ineffective whack-a-mole actions. Basically nothing was the answer.
Meta has cutting edge technology, increasingly bolstered by AI tools. It can remove posts with nudity or certain prohibited words in seconds, yet posts displaying live tigers or chimpanzees, or products made of ivory or rhino horn, with text plainly offering them for sale, remain up indefinitely.
Why is Meta not taking effective action?
The answer is financial profit. Meta raked in over US$200 billion in advertising and other revenue in 2025. Ad revenue is based on user engagement – “clicks” – the more eyes for the longest periods of time on a page attracts the most ad revenue.
Meta makes billions of dollars by incentivizing its users to post to the max. It doesn’t care what the post contents consist of, as long as they generate user engagement, which in turn creates more revenue.
Meta has used Machiavellian tactics in bringing onboard untold thousands of users as content creators, in effect transforming them into employees.
If Meta cracked down on every type of illegal or unethical posting, it would take a significant hit to its bottom line, affecting its share price in the stock market. This explains why Meta not only allows wildlife trafficking, but it also allows child sexual exploitation, human trafficking, drug trafficking, rage-bait posts spreading disinformation and a host of other harmful content.
The business model demands maximum profit at all costs. Ethics or concern for ecosystem collapse – the death of Nature – do not have a column in the Meta accounting spreadsheet.
Initial reaction from Meta
AFP journalist Sara Hussein was the first to break the story about the Clicks That Kill report. AFP contacted Meta for a right-of-reply response. Meta declined to respond to questions from AFP, and pointed to policies that restrict the sale of endangered species on its platforms.
Patrol contacted the Meta person whom AFP had engaged with, described on her LinkedIn page as a Policy Communications Manager. As with AFP, Meta has so far declined to respond to the report or answer any questions, but simply asked for account links that could be “investigated”.
These accounts will no doubt be closed by Meta, whacking more moles, who will pop up with new names quite quickly.
But the business model carries on, resulting in the forests and savannahs of the world being denuded of wildlife to prop up Meta’s share price and make Mark Zuckerberg a very rich man.
Editors note: This recent article by Jaclynn Ashly profiles some of the rescued chimpanzees now at Sweetwaters Chimpanzee Sanctuary. It also describes well the serious problem of chimpanzee trafficking.
The illicit great ape trade operates within the same forces destabilizing chimpanzee habitats: armed conflict, extractive industries that carve roads into once-remote forests, and the poverty they produce.
A low hum threads through the morning air above the Sweetwaters Chimpanzee Sanctuary in Kenya’s central highlands. As it grows louder — a small propeller drifting in from Mount Kenya — Max is already moving.
He snatches a dry branch, paces the electric fence, and begins shouting — ah-ah-ah — his cries rising into a scream at the sky. He swings his arm and sends the stick flying upward. His hair bristles along his spine.
“It’s because of the plane,” says Stephen Mukundi, the sanctuary’s head caregiver. “He is remembering Burundi during the civil war.”
A view of Sweetwaters Chimpanzee Sanctuary, set on the southeastern edge of the 360-square-kilometer Ol Pejeta Conservancy in Laikipia County — the only refuge of its kind in Kenya. Photo by Jaclynn AshlyA caregiver hands food through the fence at Sweetwaters. The sanctuary’s caregivers live on-site around the clock, learning each chimpanzee’s temperament so closely that they decide every evening who can safely sleep beside whom. Photo by Jaclynn Ashly.Stephen Mukundi, the sanctuary’s head caregiver, walks the perimeter of the enclosure. He arrived at Ol Pejeta in 1996 and has known most of the chimpanzees here since they were infants — a second family, he says, that he has watched go from trauma to becoming chimpanzees again. Photo by Jaclynn Ashly.
Max was born in Burundi in 1988. Captured as an infant — his mother presumed killed — he spent his early years with a French film crew before being confiscated in 1990 at around two years old, and transferred to the Jane Goodall Institute’s rescue center in Bujumbura.
When the Burundian civil war broke out in 1993, the Institute evacuated — a crisis that led to the founding of Sweetwaters. Max was one of three chimpanzees airlifted across borders, a founding resident of what remains the country’s only refuge of its kind.
Today, Max is one of roughly 35 chimpanzees at the sanctuary — each rescued from the overlapping pressures of conflict, habitat loss, and the illegal wildlife trade. Some were repatriated from the Middle East, where they had been kept as pets or displayed in private zoos. Others arrived as infants with bullet wounds, or were discovered in crates at airports mislabeled as other animals.
The forces that brought them here are sustained by demand far beyond the forests they were taken from — wealthy buyers, private zoos, and commercial attractions that turn infant apes into status symbols and entertainment. While sanctuaries like Sweetwaters absorb the consequences, the trade continues to grow. For every chimpanzee rescued, many more are not.
Chimpanzees at Sweetwaters, the only sanctuary of its kind in Kenya — home to roughly 35 great apes, each rescued from the overlapping pressures of armed conflict, habitat loss, and the illegal wildlife trade. Photo by Jaclynn Ashly.A mother and her infant at Sweetwaters. The sanctuary is not a breeding facility — females are placed on contraception — but occasional unintended births mean a small number of chimpanzees have been born here. Photo by Jaclynn Ashly.
Second Family
The sanctuary lies on the southeastern edge of the 360-square-kilometer Ol Pejeta Conservancy in Laikipia County, where the last two northern white rhinos on earth remain.
The Ewaso Nyiro River divides the sanctuary’s chimpanzee enclosures into western and eastern sections. Chimpanzees are not native to Kenya — their range extends from Senegal across the Congo Basin to western Uganda — making Sweetwaters the only place in the country where they live.
Chimpanzees arrive to live out their lives here. Sweetwaters is not a breeding facility; females are placed on contraception, though occasional unintended births mean a small number have been born at the sanctuary.
Max is 38 now. “He doesn’t like people — large groups, cameras, long lenses, anything that reminds him of the film crew that handled him as a baby,” says 49-year-old Mukundi. Max also moves against the grain of his own society, picking fights and disregarding the social codes that hold the group together. Although he distrusts adult humans, he shows a particular affinity for children.
“Maybe they were kind to him during his captivity,” says Mukundi, a father of five. When two children arrive during visiting hours, Max, lingering near the fence, looks up immediately and begins to play, running along it and urging them to follow.
Max plays with two children visiting the sanctuary. Distrustful of adults after his early years with a French film crew, he shows a particular affinity for kids — perhaps, his caregivers say, because they were kind to him during his captivity. Video by Jaclynn Ashly.
Mukundi has been at Sweetwaters almost as long as Max. He arrived at Ol Pejeta in 1996 at 19, starting as a gatekeeper, then a night guard, then a caregiver. The work is demanding. The sanctuary’s 16 caregivers live on-site around the clock; Mukundi’s family lives 30 kilometers away and he sees them once a month.
“I’ve grown to really love these chimpanzees,” Mukundi tells TRNN, smiling. “They’ve become like a second family. I’ve raised most of them, known them since they were babies. I’ve seen them go from trauma to becoming chimpanzees again.”
He knows each animal by temperament, and every evening decides who sleeps where in the holding house — a decision with real stakes. If the wrong two males are placed together, “they might kill each other at night.”
Each caregiver has a favorite. For Mukundi, it is Manno, who arrived in 2016 from Iraqi Kurdistan.
Manno was taken from his mother in Central Africa shortly after birth and traffickedthrough the Middle East to Iraq, where he spent three years at Duhok Zoo. He was kept alone in a small cage stacked above a crate of boa constrictors. He never saw, heard, or smelled another chimpanzee. Zoo staff dressed him in children’s clothes; visitors handed him candy, soda, and cigarettes, which he learned to smoke.
In his last months in Iraq, a Syrian refugee worker at the zoo took him home at night, where he slept in a bed and was treated as part of the family — reinforcing a childhood shaped entirely by human contact.
When Manno arrived at Sweetwaters — after a year of planning his rescue — he was terrified. “I stayed with him the whole time,” Mukundi recalls. “He had never seen or heard another chimp before. I was like his father and mother. Every morning, he would run to hug me. I had to wait until he fell asleep to leave.”
Integration follows a sequence the sanctuary has refined over decades. New arrivals are introduced in stages — first to a calm female, then to others, followed by juveniles and lower-ranking males. Dominant males come last; their reaction can determine whether integration succeeds.
Today, Manno is competing for dominance in the eastern group, and Mukundi believes he could become the next alpha. “He just has about two more males to fight,” he says, with quiet pride.
“He came here alone, knowing nothing — not even that he was a chimpanzee. Now look at him. He’s finding himself and fighting for his place.”
Inside the Supply Chain
Chimpanzees like Max and Manno are survivors of a trade that removes thousands of great apes from the wild each year — captured for the pet and entertainment industries or killed for bushmeat — with chimpanzees among the most heavily targeted.
There are as few as 170,000 chimpanzees remaining in the wild — down from about 1 million at the start of the 20th century. All four subspecies are endangered. The western subspecies, critically endangered, fell by 80% between 1990 and 2014. The International Union for Conservation of Nature says the subspecies is now on a trajectory toward extinction without drastic intervention.
The illicit great ape trade operates within the same forces destabilizing chimpanzee habitats: armed conflict, extractive industries that carve roads into once-remote forests, and the poverty they produce pushing rural communities into the low-paid end of the poaching chain.
Scientists attribute the decline to a combination of habitat loss, poaching, and disease — pressures driven by poverty, conflict, extractive industries, and infrastructure expansion. Africa has the highest rate of forest loss in the world, losing roughly 9.6 million acres each year.
The illicit great ape trade operates within the same forces destabilizing chimpanzee habitats: armed conflict, extractive industries that carve roads into once-remote forests, and the poverty they produce pushing rural communities into the low-paid end of the poaching chain. State officials, meanwhile, often do more than fail to stop the trade; in some cases, they profit from it.
Across Western and Central Africa, these dynamics are embedded in land use itself: more than half the range of western gorillas and chimpanzees now falls within active logging concessions, where new access routes and labor camps both expand poaching and create sustained demand for bushmeat — wild meat often sold to urban elites.
“Mining and logging don’t create the trade — but they accelerate it,” says Ofir Drori, a wildlife law enforcement strategist who has spent two decades pushing governments to prosecute wildlife crime. “They open the forest, build roads, and make transport easy. These industries are facilitators, and at times their own personnel are directly implicated.”
In the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), armed groups embedded in artisanal mining for coltan and gold drive much of the bushmeat poaching that produces trafficked infant apes. A 2018 Global Financial Integrity report identified a similar pattern in Sierra Leone, where post-war mining expansion has been linked to sharp declines in chimpanzee populations.
“The profit margins for great apes are far higher than any other species,” Drori tells TRNN. “The rarer the species, the more valuable.” While armed militias are heavily involved in poaching, Drori says he has found no clear evidence linking them to great ape trafficking. The trade runs on a different infrastructure — organized crime families and corrupted officials.
At the center are trafficking dynasties — extended families spread across multiple countries in West and Central Africa, laundering wild-caught infants through fraudulent CITES documentation.
Under CITES — the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species — chimpanzees are listed in Appendix I, prohibiting all commercial trade. However, captive-bred specimens of Appendix I species can be traded commercially — provided the breeding operation is formally registered with CITES. No such registered facility for great apes exists anywhere in the world.
Traffickers exploit this gap through what enforcement specialists call the “C-scam.” Corrupt CITES authorities in exporting countries stamp permits with a “C” source code — designating an animal as captive-bred — for apes that were taken directly from the wild. In some cases, wild-caught apes are funneled through unregistered breeding operations in the Middle East — along with private zoos and safari parks that pose as conservation centers — where their wild origins are rewritten as captive-bred on paper. But no facility in the world is recognized by CITES for great ape breeding — meaning any permit claiming a great ape is captive-bred is inherently fraudulent.
“A corrupt CITES authority can turn an illegal shipment legal with a single signature,” Drori notes.
Prosecutions of traffickers and corrupt government officials have followed, but the illicit network has adapted faster than the law, Drori explains. When one node is dismantled, smuggling routes shift while remaining largely intact, and corruption migrates with them — more recently to the DRC, where the US State Department sanctioned senior officials at the Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN) for trafficking great apes and other protected wildlife to China on falsified permits.
According to Daniel Stiles, a leading specialist on the live great ape trade, ICCN officials continue to issue fraudulent permits for wild-caught great apes.
“For the first time, we’re seeing poaching bands specifically targeting great apes — not for the meat,” Stiles says. “They kill the adults, take the infants, and leave the carcasses behind.”
The supply runs through a short list of transit hubs. Kano, in northern Nigeria, has been a primary hub since the 1990s. Istanbul has emerged as a key transit point: on December 22, 2024, Turkish customs intercepted a flight from Nigeria carrying a five-month-old gorilla named Zeytin in a crate bound for Bangkok labeled “50 rabbits.” The investigation traced the syndicate back to Kano. Cairo, Sharm el Sheikh, Khartoum, and Dubai have also been documented as launder points.
For decades, poaching was driven by the elite bushmeat economy, where great ape meat is sold in urban markets as a status symbol — luxury “big man’s meat.” The infants orphaned in these hunts were a secondary product. That equation has now been inverted: what was once a byproduct of the bushmeat trade is now a targeted, high-value extraction. As prices for live infants have surged — rising roughly tenfold over the past decade — the infant has become the primary target of a demand-driven international trade, fueled by status-symbol pets in the Middle East and commercial attractions in Asia, and now outpacing the profits of any other forest commodity.
“For the first time, we’re seeing poaching bands specifically targeting great apes — not for the meat,” Stiles says. “They kill the adults, take the infants, and leave the carcasses behind.”
When poachers locate a troop in the canopy — anywhere between 10 to 150 individuals — they fire directly. The adults die defending their young. The infants are pried from their mothers’ bodies and sold alive, sometimes with gunshot wounds of their own.
Accounting for adults killed and infants who die in transit, researchers estimate each surviving orphan can represent up to 25 chimpanzees killed. By this measure, each chimpanzee at Sweetwaters stands as evidence of potentially hundreds of deaths.
Written on Their Bodies
The geographies of this violence are written onto the sanctuary’s residents.
Ali Kaka, current alpha of the eastern group, was kept as a pet by the South Sudanese army for his first 18 months; in 2003, soldiers handed him over when they learned chimpanzees were being rescued to Kenya. Safari, an elderly male, spent his early years in a small outdoor cage at a Burundi hotel, taunted by holidaymakers until the Belgian manager surrendered him in 1989.
And then there is Poco.
Poco was born around 1981 in the forests of Central Africa. Captured as an infant — likely around three years old, after his mother was killed — he was sold to a shop owner in Bujumbura, who kept him in a narrow cage hung from the ceiling to attract customers. Poco lived in that cage for nine years. It was too small for him to lie down or move on all fours. Over time, his musculature, spine, and shoulders adapted to that constraint, and he developed an upright gait.
Rescued in 1989 by the Jane Goodall Institute and later transferred to Sweetwaters, Poco, now in his late 40s, is the only chimpanzee documented to walk bipedally by default.
Poco at Sweetwaters. Captured as an infant in Central Africa around 1981, he was rescued by the Jane Goodall Institute in 1989 and later transferred to the sanctuary, where he has lived ever since. Photo by Jaclynn Ashly.The cage that held Poco for nine years, now preserved at Sweetwaters as a teaching object for visitors. Hung from the ceiling of a Bujumbura shop to attract customers, it was too small for him to lie down or move on all fours — reshaping his spine and shoulders so that, decades later, he remains the only chimpanzee documented to walk upright as default. Photo by Jaclynn Ashly.
Poco walks upright through his enclosure at Sweetwaters — the only chimpanzee documented to do so as default, his gait shaped by the nine years he spent in a cage too small to lie down or move on all fours. Video by Jaclynn Ashly.
What Dr. Stephen Ngulu, a wildlife veterinarian and former head of the sanctuary, learned over a decade there is how to read a chimpanzee’s history in its body.
“When they arrive, they are often dehydrated, malnourished, and sometimes injured,” he says. “Behaviorally, they are always withdrawn. They don’t want anything to do with humans or other chimpanzees.”
Many injuries are not visible: stunted growth, unhealed fractures, muscle wasting from years chained in place, dental disease from diets of chocolate and fried food. Chronic stress leaves deeper damage — suppressed immunity, delayed sexual maturation, neurological impairment.
“You can at times see a traumatized chimpanzee stargazing — not looking at anything,” Ngulu explains. “Unable to have proper cognitive abilities.”
The behavioral signs are consistent across arrivals: rocking side to side, the same motion seen in humans under extreme distress. Research has shown chimpanzees who survived prolonged captivity exhibit symptoms closely matching human complex PTSD. Chimpanzees and humans also share more than 98% of their DNA — our closest living relatives.
“A frightened chimpanzee can recover with time,” Ngulu tells TRNN. “But a deeply traumatized chimpanzee will show persistent abnormal behaviors. Even with optimal care, those behaviors can last for many years.”
In 2018, an infant named Bo arrived from Guinea-Bissau, confiscated from traffickers who had killed her mother for bushmeat and intended to sell her. “She was missing one tooth,” Ngulu remembers. “She was fearful and withdrawn.”
Bo survived and is now 11. “But to this day,” says Ngulu, “you will still see her sometimes sitting alone and slightly rocking back and forth.”
But not all the chimpanzees arrive at the sanctuary carrying scars. Alley came from a private home that treated her well. Nicknamed “the engineer,” she is caretaker Martin Kinyua’s favorite.
“She’s so intelligent we had to separate her from the other chimps,” says 45-year-old Kinyua, a father of three who has worked at the sanctuary since 2000. “Whenever she’s in the group, she has a big influence on the other chimps, even helping them break out of their enclosure.”
By observing sanctuary staff, Alley learned that dry wood does not conduct electricity. She used sticks to hold the live wires of the electric fence apart, making a gap for herself and the others to pass through. Caretakers also observed other chimpanzees in her group collecting sticks and handing them to her to assist in the escapes.
Alley has a record of trying to bite people after her breakouts — but not Kinyua, who describes a special bond with her. He recalls standing alone in the holding house when she appeared in the doorway after an escape, close enough to grab him. She didn’t raise her hair or advance.
“Alley trusts me,” he says, with a grin. Alley’s ingenuity — and repeated breakouts — became such a persistent problem that the sanctuary was forced to rebuild, separating her during the day in an enclosure with elderly Poco and reinforcing it with chicken wire.
A caregiver feeds Alley and Poco at Sweetwaters. Alley — nicknamed “the engineer” for using sticks to hold the electric fence’s live wires apart and lead group escapes — is now housed during the day with elderly Poco in a reinforced enclosure. Photo by Jaclynn Ashly. Martin Kinyua, 45, has worked at Sweetwaters since 2000. His favorite chimpanzee is Alley — “the engineer” — who has tried to bite others after her breakouts but, he says, has never turned on him. Photo by Jaclynn Ashly.
“The more you understand how intelligent these chimpanzees are, the more anger and grief you feel at the way they’ve been treated,” Kinyua says. “These are not pets. They are very intelligent beings.”
A Global Demand
While the supply chain runs across Africa, the demand that drives it lies largely outside the continent. In the Gulf, Russia, and Eastern Europe, infant chimpanzees are kept as status-symbol pets — sometimes gifted between elites — while in China and Southeast Asia, growing demand from private zoos, safari parks, and tourist attractions fuels a commercial market.
Across these contexts, infants function as luxury commodities and entertainment — appearing on social media in children’s clothes, posed on private jets, or used as selfie props — within a global trade driven by high-paying international buyers.
“Prices have quadrupled over the past decade,” Stiles tells TRNN. “An infant chimp can sell for up to $200,000, bonobos $300,000, and gorillas $550,000.” At the bottom of the chain, poachers are paid “peanuts,” often no more than $100.
For decades, the primary buyers were wealthy individuals in the Gulf who kept great apes as pets. That shifted in 2016, when the UAE banned private ownership of dangerous animals, restricting them to licensed facilities, Stiles explains.
“So these traders, who had been dealing in animals for years, started registering private zoos,” Stiles says. “To finance them, they opened them to the public. They make money through selfies and direct interaction — but for that, you need young animals, before they reach puberty and become dangerous.”
The result has been a proliferation of “private zoos” across China, the Gulf States, especially the UAE, Pakistan, and parts of South Asia — facilities that function as legal cover for private collections. Stiles alleges that major commercial operators in the Gulf have become significant players, relying on “a combination of legal and illegal acquisition.”
China has driven much of the parallel demand: roughly 10,000 zoos opened there between 2013 and 2020, nearly doubling the national total. Registered zoos can obtain import permits for strictly protected species far more easily than individuals — making them, Stiles notes, ideal laundering facilities for animals smuggled in and sold as captive-bred.
The pipeline also extends into India. Vantara — a vast private facility operated by the Ambani family and marketed as a wildlife rescue center — is alleged to have receivedchimpanzees exported from the DRC on CITES permits listing them as captive-bred. India’s Supreme Court ruled last year that Vantara’s imports were legal and barred further legal actions; however, a CITES Secretariat verification mission to India later flagged the captive-bred designations as questionable.
The United States is not immune to these dynamics. In July 2025, Bhagavan “Doc” Antle — owner of Myrtle Beach Safari and a figure popularized by the Netflix documentary Tiger King — was sentenced to federal prison for conspiring to violate the Lacey Act, a law prohibiting the illegal trade of protected wildlife. Antle paid $200,000 each for at least two chimpanzees and disguised the payments as donations to his conservation nonprofit — part of what prosecutors described as a years-long pattern of trafficking federally protected species.
Court filings described him as “a key player in the illegal chimpanzee trade” that others have sought to emulate. Yet despite the convictions, the United States still has no federal ban on private primate ownership. The Captive Primate Safety Act, which would amend the Lacey Act to ban private possession of primates, was reintroduced in May 2025 after previous attempts since 2005 failed to pass both chambers of Congress.
Social media has further accelerated the market. Since 2015, Stiles has documented more than 684 advertisements for great apes posted by at least 152 individuals across 19 countries, mostly on Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp. In 2014, most images showed apes in private homes. “Now it’s transformed,” Stiles says. “Ninety percent — they’re at a zoo.”
Stiles has advocated for legal accountability for social media companies facilitating the illegal trade in wildlife. “Meta could put a stop to this overnight,” he says. “But they’re allowing it because they’re making money from it.”
Enforcement outside Africa remains largely ineffective. Ofir Drori’s EAGLE Network has helped put more than 3,000 wildlife traffickers behind bars — mostly in Africa. Beyond the continent, he says, “there is no real enforcement. It’s a joke worldwide, especially in Europe.” At a CITES conference last year, member states moved to revive a long-dormant Great Apes Enforcement Task Force.
But Stiles believes supply-side enforcement alone is futile. “We have to put our attention on the demand side — the people buying,” he says. “You can arrest as many poachers as you want. But if the demand continues, those poachers will be immediately replaced.”
The enemy, Stiles says, is not a discrete set of criminals. It is a global market.
The Afterlife
Late afternoon at Sweetwaters is the quiet hour. The light begins to go orange along the ridge.
Poco turns and walks, upright, back toward the trees, the gait itself a record of the cage above the shop in Bujumbura. That cage — the one that held him for nine years — sits on display in the sanctuary grounds, preserved as a teaching object for tourists who ask how chimpanzees end up here.
Across the river is Kisazose, or Kiza for short, confiscated from a Congolese trafficker and brought to Sweetwaters in 1994 as an ill, undernourished infant. Timothy Njuguna, a 52-year-old caretaker at the sanctuary since 1995, cared for him then. “We used to go inside [the enclosure] with them when they first arrived,” he says, “because they were just babies. We used to even cuddle them.”
Timothy Njuguna, 52, has worked at Sweetwaters since 1995. Years ago, when a group of chimpanzees broke loose and pinned him to the floor of the holding house, Kiza — whom he had cared for since infancy — fought the others off and gave him a chance to escape. Photo by Jaclynn Ashly.
Years later, when Kiza had grown, a group of chimpanzees broke through the fencing undetected and escaped into the holding facility where Njuguna was preparing their dinner. One of the males pinned him to the floor. Others moved in.
“I thought for sure they would kill me,” says Njuguna, a father of two. “But Kiza, because he was a friend of mine, protected me. He immediately started fighting with them. At that moment, I got a chance to run away. Kiza literally saved my life.”
“Before I started working here, I didn’t realize chimpanzees were so close to humans,” he continues. “They use tools, they think the way people think, they solve their problems. After working with them, I came to realize they are very close to human beings.”
Florence Kangethe, a 31-year-old wildlife veterinarian who has worked at the sanctuary for nearly four years, arrived at the same conclusion through clinical practice.
Timothy Njuguna near the enclosure with one of the few chimpanzees born at Sweetwaters — an unintended birth at a sanctuary that does not breed its residents. Photo by Jaclynn Ashly.Florence Kanyede, a wildlife veterinarian at Sweetwaters for nearly four years, says watching the chimpanzees reveals friendships, gossip, grooming rituals, and quiet introverts — “really like a mirror to ourselves.” Photo by Jaclynn Ashly.
“If you sit down with them for one hour, you’ll pick up so many different things,” she says. “Two best friends probably gossiping together, then grooming, or a mother-child bond here, then the introvert sitting by themselves. They’re really like a mirror to ourselves.”
By early evening, the keepers begin moving the chimpanzees into the holding house. Mukundi stands at the gate, calling each one by name. Most come. Max does not. He sits at the edge of the enclosure, ignoring the call.
“He’s stubborn,” Mukundi says, with a chuckle. “He knows he has to go in. But he wants to make it difficult.”
Max is among the least liked by his own troop. He cannot sleep with the dominant males; they would attack each other by morning. According to Mukundi, he gets away with his rebellions because he has formed a close bond with the group’s alpha, who always comes to his defense.
Members of the group wait outside the holding house at Sweetwaters as the light begins to go orange along the ridge. Photo by Jaclynn Ashly.A chimpanzee slips into the narrow entrance of the holding house at Sweetwaters, where the sanctuary’s residents are settled in for the night. Photo by Jaclynn Ashly.Max sits at the edge of the enclosure, ignoring the call to come in for the night. “He’s stubborn,” says head caregiver Stephen Mukundi. “He knows he has to go in. But he wants to make it difficult.” Photo by Jaclynn Ashly.
“If Max likes you, he really likes you — and you will know,” Mukundi says. “And if he hates you, he makes it very clear. He will even collect feces or find big rocks and throw them at you. He doesn’t hide anything.”
Eventually, Max relents. He passes Mukundi and slips into the narrow entrance of the holding facility. Mukundi watches him go, laughing softly — like one might at a troublesome relative — knowing he has made many enemies inside.
“Sweetwaters was set up to offer lifelong care,” says Ngulu, the former manager. “So if there are no more chimpanzees that need to be rescued — if the systems in the countries where they are found are working properly — then there is no need to have a sanctuary. The animals would live out their lives here, die, and we can close because everything now is perfect.”
“But, unfortunately, we seem to be heading in the opposite direction.”
The zoo – run by the son of India’s richest man – is under investigation for claims its animals have been bought illegally. Evidence suggests some may have come from UAE-based animal import companies.
BY DANIEL STILES SEPTEMBER 1, 2025
A number of South African wild animal exporters have been supplying animal import companies in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) with birds and animals, despite questions over whether this has been done in compliance with the global treaty governing wildlife trading.
Yet the evidence obtained in this investigation shows that South African companies appear to be shipping endangered wild species directly to Vantara, including leopards, cheetahs, tigers, African grey parrots and Scarlet macaws.
Some of these animals are re-exported to Vantara, a 1,200ha area adjacent to a huge oil refinery in Jamnagar, India, which is billed as the world’s largest zoo, with an animal population running into the hundreds of thousands.
This compounds the controversy over Vantara, originally known as the Greens Zoological Rescue and Rehabilitation Centre, which is the brainchild of Anant Ambani, the son of petrochemical billionaire Mukesh Ambani, India’s richest man.
Last week, India’s Supreme Court ordered an investigation into claims that animals were being bought illegally, that wildlife laws were being flouted, and that this involved financial irregularities and possible money-laundering.
This will be a blow to a family with a reputation for living large: its home in Mumbai is a 27-storey building, and Ambani gets around in a Boeing 327 Max. Anant’s three-day wedding last year – billed as India’s “own royal wedding” – cost an estimated $600m.
But despite the allegations that Ambani has bent the rules in building his megazoo, he claims that “Vantara is a combination of the age-old ethical value of compassion with the excellence of modern scientific and technological professionalism”. Last year, he said animal care is a selfless service towards “the almighty as well as humanity”.
Yet investigations suggest a number of South African exporters, and an obscure animal shelter and zoo in the Abu Dhabi desert town of Al Ain in the UAE, have supplied thousands of exotic animals to Vantara using questionable sourcing practices.
The UAE entities – the Kangaroo Animals Shelter Center (KASC), and the Capital Zoo and Wildlife Park (CZWP) – are owned by wildlife trader Khaled Aldhaheri, and have supplied more than 7,800 animals of protected species to Vantara.
Both KASC and CZWP were unknown before February 2023, when KASC made its first shipment of exotic animals to Vantara, followed by the first shipment by CZWP in February 2024.
Aldhaheri appears to operate through three commercial animal trading companies in Abu Dhabi: Kangaroo Animals Trading, Kangaroo Est and Ekat. Kangaroo Logistics is an Aldhaheri company used to import and export animals.
Akwaaba Predator Park, owned by the South African Nazeer Cajee, exported five cheetahs, five leopards and 14 Bengal tigers to Kangaroo Animals Trading. In his personal capacity, Cajee also exported two white tigers and three “snow” tigers to Kangaroo Animals Trading.
Akwaaba has since been closed, but has been accused of running a lion breeding and canned lion hunting operation.
It underscored a grim truth: while South Africa has no officially registered tiger breeding facilities, it has become the world’s largest exporter of live tigers and their parts, according to the US-based non-profit Big Cat Rescue.
“These animals are bred in captivity for everything from trophy hunting to illegal bone trade, feeding demand in China and other markets,” it said.
Captive bred tigers at South Africa’s Mystic Monkeys and Feathers wildlife park, one of the exporters to Vantara.
Nonetheless, this year, the Wildlife Animal Protection Forum South Africa, an animal rights organisation, published a report claiming that Vantara imported 40 cheetahs from Akwaaba, along with almost 500 other animals. But disturbingly, they could find no record of the South Africa export, except for 40 tigers and one ocelot.
The forum expressed concern about Vantara buying big cats from South Africa to become “breeding machines, exploited within the numerous animal breeding facilities (nurseries) located outside the main zoo” at Vantara.
New evidence suggests that at least five of the Akwaaba cheetahs, seven leopards and 24 tigers went to Vantara via the Kangaroo Animal Shelter. These were not distressed animals in need of rescue, but appeared to be commercial trades.
While neither Cajee or Aldhaheri responded to requests for comments, Vantara has denied this. It says all animals “received from facilities abroad are on a noncommercial basis, with prior confirmation from the CITES [Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species] management and statutory authorities of both countries”.
The UAE CITES Management Authority had not responded to a request for comment by the time of publication.
In an emailed statement, Aldhaheri confirmed that he operated KASC, but denied he was an animal trader.
“The shelter’s sole purpose is the welfare and rescue of animals, and all activities are conducted in strict compliance with UAE laws and relevant international regulations,” he said. “Your claim that I am involved in animal trade is entirely baseless.”
Yet this contradicts what Aldhaheri seems to have written on an animal trading website, where he said: “We are importer and exporter of live animals [sic]”, adding that he is “regularly selling” wildlife, and “regularly buying” exotic animals, including big cats.
This highlights a glaring loophole in the CITES rules. While highly endangered species cannot be traded commercially, they can be exported to other countries provided the shipment is classified as being for a “zoological institution”.
Aldhaheri has not yet responded to additional questions sent to him for this article. Yet he seems to have made changes to his business to make it more acceptable to Vantara.
His company, Kangaroo Animals Trading, has now been converted to the Kangaroo Animals Shelter Center, asserting that its “sole purpose is the welfare and rescue of animals”.
This is what Vantara requires as a registered rescue centre. Indian law says that “no zoo shall acquire, sell or transfer any wild or captive animal except from or to a recognised zoo”.
Exposing Kangaroo traders
Patricia Tricorache has investigated wildlife trafficking for two decades with theCheetah Conservation Fund and Colorado State University. She has reported extensively on the trafficking of cheetahs out of the Horn of Africa.
“I first heard of Khaled Aldhaheri, operating as Kangaroo Animals Trading, back in August 2022, when a source in the UAE informed me that Kangaroo was using its licence to import and sell lemurs and tigers with CITES permits and selling them ‘under the table’,” she said.
Tricorache said the firm began by trading in livestock, but later moved into more exotic species such as big cats, and Africa’s great apes.
Export records show that KASC and CZWP’s shipments to Vantara included endangered species such as a mountain gorilla, chimpanzees, Tapanuli orangutans, cheetahs, jaguars and Bengal tigers.
Yet all of these species are listed as threatened with extinction, so any trade in them is strictly regulated by CITES, a treaty ratified by both South Africa and India back in the 1970s.
This means trading in those species is only authorised in exceptional circumstances, like for scientific research, and must be accompanied by a CITES issued import and export permit. Animals seized from the illegal trade may also be exported in exceptional circumstances, such as relocation to a sanctuary, but this is clearly specified as such.
CITES trade records have yet to be made public for 2024 and 2025, so it is impossible to say how many animals were transported without permits. But what is known from trade records is that KASC and CZWP exported 77% of the endangered animals shipped from the UAE to India between 2023 and June this year.
Customs data shows CZWP exported a mountain gorilla to Vantara in 2024, but this seems unlikely to have been one in captivity.
Ian Redmond of the Ape Alliance and the Gorilla Organization, who has worked with gorillas for almost five decades, says “the only mountain gorillas in captivity in recent decades were the orphans in the Senkwekwe Centre at the Virunga National Park” in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
“They exist only in the wild in two relatively small areas of forested mountains where the DRC, Uganda and Rwanda converge. If one was exported to the UAE, then re-exported to India, it can only have been taken from the wild,” Redmond said.
And this would have entailed much slaughter. Redmond says the capture would “almost certainly” have resulted in the death of at least two adults – being the gorilla’s parents.
“As most gorilla infants die before reaching competent care, it is very likely other infants would have been captured, also by killing their parents, but didn’t make it,” he said.
Aldhaheri did not respond to a request for comment on the mountain gorilla trade.
Still, there are other red flags in the trade records.
For instance, Vantara imported a bonobo from KASC in February 2024, and there is one CITES record showing that a bonobo was imported to the UAE from Iraq in 2023. Yet Iraq’s CITES data shows no imports of bonobos – a discrepancy often seen as indicating illegal trade.
Among the 25 most threatened primates on earth, found only in the Batang Toru forest in Sumatra, Indonesia, is the Tapanuli orangutan. There are fewer than 800 in the world.
Yet the KASC supplied one to Vantara in February 2024, and the CITES trade database has a record of the UAE importing the animal from Indonesia – but, curiously, Indonesia did not report the export of that orangutan.
Orangutan conservation groups say there is only one way in which such an animal was obtained.
Andrew Gunnyon, speaking on behalf of The Orangutan Project, said: “There are no Tapanuli orangutans in captivity. The orangutan would have been poached from the wild.”
Gunung Gea of the Scorpion Foundation, a wildlife trade monitoring group based in Sumatra, concurs. “I strongly suspect that it was smuggled via eastern seaports of Sumatra crossing Malacca Straits to Malaysia, then to some other countries,” he said.
There are similar red flags around the chimpanzees which arrived in India.
While KASC exported 46 chimpanzees to Vantara, CITES reported that only 30 had been imported to the UAE by the end of 2023. None of the chimps arriving at KASC had their origins declared to CITES, barring three that arrived in Iraq from Germany in 2022 and the Tapanuli orangutan from an unknown source in Indonesia.
Indian trade records show that 36 chimps arrived in the country from the UAE in 2023, six fewer than UAE reports having exported. Strangely, India indicates that eight of the chimps originated in South Africa – yet South Africa does not report that export.
However, new questions have emerged after Tricorache shared a video that had circulated on trading groups by an Iraqi dealer, who says he sold seven of the 11 Iraqi chimps to Aldhaheri.
Four of the seven trafficked chimpanzees shown in the Iraqi’s WhatsApp chat, origin unknown. Images are screengrabs of videos supplied by Patricia Tricorache.
Four of the seven trafficked chimpanzees shown in the Iraqi’s WhatsApp chat, origin unknown. Images are screengrabs of videos supplied by Patricia Tricorache.
Cheetah shenanigans
There are similar problems with the cheetahs exported to Vantara, some of which came from South Africa. Of the 50 cheetahs that the UAE exported to India between 2023 and May 2025, Aldhaheri exported 38 to Vantara.
Again, this data throws up several contradictions: in 2023, the UAE reported to CITES that it had exported 10 cheetahs to India, all bearing a source code indicating they were from a CITES-registered facility allowed to breed the animals for commercial purposes.
The problem, however, is that there are no such breeding facilities registered with CITES in the UAE. So where did these animals come from?
“Under normal circumstances, cheetahs require very large spaces,” Tricorache says. “In Namibia, for example, the government dictates that the legal space to house cheetahs is one hectare per animal. If the Google Maps measurements are right, [KASC]’s space is roughly 8m x 10m, or 80m , which would be completely inadequate.”
Aldhaheri’s websites sheds little light on what’s going on.
KASC’s website is a single page with dead links and much of the site’s text is placeholder language in Latin. A Google search of the location lists KASC as a “pet shop”, while satellite images show a small building in the Al Ain industrial area that ostensibly was used to transship thousands of animals to India.
Similarly, CZWP’s website was only created in early 2025, though it is more developed. Some links are active, though most lead to external sites that have nothing to do with the zoo in the Al Ain desert.
Yet some of the animals shown on CZWP’s website include chimpanzees, orangutans, a variety of lemurs and leopards. The website also includes a phone number, which if called plays a pre-recorded message: “Our zoo will remain closed to the public until further notice.”
The website includes numerous positive reviews from supposed visitors, and coordinates of its location, which is a barren sandy region to the west of Al Ain. Its structure consists of a long shed with stalls that look more suited to livestock.
This ramshackle set of structures in the desert are hardly suitable for housing great apes and big cats.
Seen together, these revelations about the suppliers to Vantara raises serious questions about the zoo’s true purpose. And much of this would run counter to the message trumpeted by Ambani’s PR machine, which is that Vantara was meant to be a sanctuary for captive animals to live in freedom with the best care.
Yet the media blitz seems to have worked. India’s prime minister Narendra Modi, for instance, has given Vantara his blessing, despite the questions over the real cost to conservation of its methods.
This is despite the fact that numerous sources have cast doubt on how Vantara sources its animals, arguing that many of the purchases amounted to commercial trading in exotic animals, some of it seemingly illegal.
Big Cat Rescue, the US based non-profit organisation, remains deeply sceptical of Vantara.
“While Vantara portrays itself as a sanctuary, its massive acquisitions of animals, particularly big cats, suggest something else. If these animals were truly rescued, where is the evidence of their previous suffering?,” it asks.
Instead, it says, critics fear that “Vantara is stockpiling animals for future breeding programmes – a move that could fuel the exotic animal trade, much like South Africa’s canned lion industry”.
If South Africa is indeed enabling this toxic wildlife trade, it is long past due for Dion George, South Africa’s environmental minister, to intervene.
An operation involving the transfer of endangered chimpanzees from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) to India has sparked international outrage and serious questions about wildlife trafficking, corruption, and misuse of CITES permits. At the centre of the controversy is a high-profile Indian zoo project,Vantara, and DRC wildlife authorities accused of misrepresenting wild-caught animals as captive-bred to facilitate their export. Conservationists warn that this case could signal a dangerous new chapter in the global illegal wildlife trade.
The trafficking of chimpanzees from the DRC has long been a troubling issue. The country is home to vital populations of great apes, but widespread poaching – often for the bushmeat trade – frequently results in orphaned young chimpanzees being captured and sold. Sanctuaries like Lwiro Primate Rehabilitation Centre serve as a refuge for these animals, working to provide care and eventual rehabilitation. However, these efforts are threatened by corrupt practices, as highlighted by the recent attempt by DRC’s Congolese Institute for the Conservation of Nature (ICCN), the wildlife authority of the DRC, to remove chimpanzees from Lwiro, allegedly under the guise of a zoo revitalisation project.
CCN letter authorising the Kinshasa Zoo director to “recover” 12 chimpanzees
The letter was signed by Yves Milan Ngangay, Director General of ICCN, which is also responsible for the nation’s sanctuaries and public zoos.
The Lwiro sanctuary, situated in a tropical forest 45km from Bukavu, just outside Kahuzi-Biega National Park, is home to about 130 chimpanzee survivors of poaching and attempted trafficking. Many saw their mothers butchered for bushmeat before their eyes and are undergoing rehabilitation at Lwiro.
The staff courageously refused to hand over the chimpanzees, and ICCN left empty-handed. Local community and conservation groups heard about the incident and issued a strong press release on 12 January condemning the attempt to “capture 12 chimpanzees at the Lwiro Primate Rehabilitation Centre. This action, initiated by the ICCN general management, constitutes a serious threat to the conservation of these endangered primates and undermines the commitment of many international partners.”
The communique announced a five-year programme to renovate the country’s zoos and botanical gardens to strengthen their role in biodiversity conservation by collecting various primate and artiodactyl (even-toed ungulate) species for research, staff training and conservation breeding.
In the communique, he criticised those who had stopped the lawful transfer of the primates to begin the “experimental” work at the Kinshasa Zoo.
Most noteworthy in the communique was that “the collection of specimens by the Institute in this vast programme can only be made from sanctuaries or else from rehabilitation centres and public and private animal parks, depending on their status and relationship with the Institute”
Several critics of the scheme have pointed out that the dilapidated Kinshasa Zoo does not have the facilities, staff or financial capacity to implement the programme presented by ICCN.
“If the mission is true, the chimpanzees will be sent to a real death trap,” warned Sara Rosenberg, a former volunteer at the Lwiro Primate Rehabilitation Center, referring to the transfer.
AG has received screenshots from videos taken on 25 January 2025 showing the zoo and chimpanzees in cages there. In the videos, the zoo indeed did appear to look in a deplorable state, with animals sitting in filthy, cramped, dilapidated cages with no items or structures offered for enrichment.
Chimpanzees at Lwiro Primates Rehabilitation Centre have carers attending to any special needs and live in natural surroundings. @Lwiro Primate Rehabilitation Centre.
Chimpanzees turn up at Kinshasa Zoo – from where?
On 13 February this year, Ofir Drori, founder-director of the wildlife law enforcement NGO EAGLE, posted a press release on their website, seen by AG but since removed, stating that in recent months, nine chimpanzees had arrived at the Kinshasa and Kisangani zoos from unexplained sources. Drori speculated that the chimps had been collected with the intention of selling them and stated:
“Links from ICCN lead to a likely buyer of the chimps. There has been a major rise in primates and other wildlife shipping to India for the past 6 months, with a sole buyer: the so-called Greens Zoological Rescue and Rehabilitation Centre (GZRRC).” GZRRC is the original name of Vantara, which aims to be the biggest zoo in the world. It is owned by Mukesh Ambani as part of GZRCC and headed up by his son, Anant Ambani.
Recently arrived chimpanzees in Kinshasa Zoo live in dirty, cramped cages
Later that day, on 13 February, the chimps were flown to India on a private jet. Our sources later confirmed that the chimpanzees had arrived at Vantara.
The DRC CITES export permit lists nine chimpanzees in the shipment, with a “Z” (zoo) purpose code and “C” (captive-bred) origin. To use a “C code”, the Appendix I specimens must have been second-generation born in captivity, and their progenitors must have been acquired legally.
The DRC CITES export permit
Contacted by AG, Ofir Drori said, “There are no great ape breeding facilities anywhere in Africa, and the chimps at the Kinshasa Zoo were certainly not bred in captivity. The wild is the only logical source for them.”
The chimpanzees, therefore, were not acquired from lawful sources. This contradicts the specification made in the ICCN official communique that states collection “can only be made from sanctuaries or else from rehabilitation centres and public and private animal parks according to the laws applying to them”. The CITES permit states that the Kinshasa Zoo is the exporter. This fact also contradicts the stated purpose of collecting the chimpanzees in the first place, which was “for research, staff training and conservation breeding”.
“They were collected to sell,” said Drori.
ICCN has denied the selling of chimpanzees. In an interview with Mongabay Africa, chief site director of the Kinshasa Zoo, Matata Ngirabose Bruno, who also headed the ICCN mission that visited Lwiro, categorically said that “the zoo does not sell animals”.
ICCN documents dated 27 December 2024, seen by AG, authorise the collection of eight chimpanzees found in captivity in villages around Buta, which is in northeastern DRC about 200 kilometres north of Kisangani. They were to be transferred to the Kinshasa Zoo by 12 January 2025.
Therefore, these chimpanzees will have been present in Kinshasa Zoo when EAGLE reported the arrival of chimps from unknown sources. It also placed these chimps at Kinshasa Zoo just a month before nine chimpanzees were exported from the zoo to Vantara.
The young chimps found in captivity in villages were likely collateral damage to bushmeat hunting, and therefore, they were captured from the wild. Under normal circumstances, such recovered chimpanzees are sent to a sanctuary for rehabilitation and proper care – not to a zoo, with little capacity to offer care and rehabilitation to the young chimps.
This also brings into question the listing of the source of these chimps as “Code C” (born in captivity). The fraudulent listing of source codes as “Code C” is a well-known tactic in trafficking circles, known as a “C-scam”. Examples of the relatively common C-scam can be found in a recent report on great ape trafficking published by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organised Crime. CITES has dealt with such cases in the past by ordering a suspension of trade by the offending parties until remedial action is taken.
Not the first shipment to Vantara
On 6 March 2025, United for Wildlife released an alert alleging that “from March of 2024 at least eight consignments of CITES-listed primates, including chimpanzees, an Appendix I species, and other wildlife were shipped on flights from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) to India.”
The alert stated: “The consignments possibly contained laundered and smuggled species hidden amongst legally traded animals, including chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas, and permits associated with the consignments may have been falsified, according to multiple confidential sources.”
DRC CITES export permits issued between 6 December 2024 and 30 January 2025 also indicate the importer as GZRRC.
One of the permits for exporting primates, birds, and turtles to GZRRC was from a known DRC animal trader. Were great apes concealed in some of the shipping crates?
Other allegations made against Vantara
In March of 2024, M Rajshekhar published an article on Vantara in the Himal Southasian newspaper. The article highlighted numerous irregularities in the origin of Vantara’s elephants from within India. It also pointed to further irregularities in the origin of other endangered species from international suppliers who were not the usual sources of animals in need of rescue and rehabilitation. The sources appeared to be commercial exotic animal traders or sources with records associated with illegal wildlife trade.
On 6 March this year, the Wild Animal Protection Forum of South Africa issued a report that questioned the extensive range of species (36) and high number of animals (765) exported to Vantara. It highlighted various problems with the different species exported, which Vantara asserts were all rescues from detrimental circumstances.
The WAPSFA report expressed concern about Vantara’s breeding plans: “The lions and tigers exported from South Africa appear to have been purchased and exported from breeding facilities in South Africa… They will now be transformed into breeding machines, exploited within the numerous animal breeding facilities (nurseries) outside the main zoo.”
The report continued: “WAPFSA would need to be convinced, based on independent, verifiable evidence that the additional list of species exported from South Africa were saved or rescued from adverse conditions.”
Later in March, the UK-based Independent reported that Vantara had dismissed the complaint by the South African coalition as “entirely false and baseless” and said they had served them a legal notice over the report.
On 13 March, the Süddeutsche Zeitung published an investigative article that alleged many irregularities regarding the sourcing of animals at Vantara, including the probability that some had been sourced from the wild, not captivity. The article alleged that 39,000 animals were being kept in Vantara by the end of 2024.
A European wildlife dealer is quoted in the article as stating, “Regardless of which wholesaler I talk to, the supply of wild animals is bought up. The supply lists are getting shorter because everything goes to India.” The fact that this demand also leads to more wild captures was “obvious” to the animal dealer.
Further action
ICCN is currently collecting other animals listed in Vantara’s “rescue list”, including bonobos and gorillas. A concerned group of wildlife NGOs has drafted a letter to the CITES Secretariat detailing several instances of trade irregularities involving Vantara, including the chimpanzee trade reported here, and entreating amongst other measures that the Secretariat and the Standing Committee (SC) request that:
India agrees to suspend imports of live specimens of CITES-listed species until this issue can be discussed at the 79th meeting of the CITES Standing Committee (SC79);
Parties refrain from issuing permits to export live animals of CITES-listed species to India until this issue can be considered at SC79.
The 79th meeting of the CITES Standing Committee will be held in November this year in Samarkand, Uzbekistan, immediately preceding the Conference of the Parties. The issue around Vantara is set to be one of the most contentious items on the agenda, pitting NGOs against a powerful billionaire family.
As international scrutiny intensifies, the case of the trafficked chimpanzees highlights the urgent need for stronger enforcement of wildlife trade laws and greater transparency in both exporting and importing countries. The upcoming CITES Standing Committee meeting in Uzbekistan could prove pivotal in setting new precedents for accountability, especially when powerful private interests are involved. For now, the fate of the trafficked chimpanzees – and potentially many more endangered species – rests on whether global conservation authorities are willing to confront systemic loopholes and hold perpetrators to account, regardless of their influence or wealth.
Ed. note: This article is translated from French from Geo magazine.
While the Democratic Republic of the Congo is in the grip of violent clashes, the capital’s zoo plans to acquire great apes from the country’s public and private sanctuaries, alarming sources interviewed by GEO. However, the establishment itself has just sent 12 chimpanzees to a zoo in India, according to the NGO fighting against wildlife trafficking EAGLE.
Twelve: that’s the number of chimpanzees which the Congolese authorities had planned to transfer from the Lwiro Primate Rehabilitation Center (LPRC), located in the South Kivu province, in the east of the country, to the Kinshasa zoo described by a former volunteer as “dying”.
And it is also the number of chimpanzees coming from the Kinshasa zoo which has just been sent “in the greatest secrecy” to India, confided the EAGLE network, an NGO fighting against poaching and wildlife trafficking, to GEO on Thursday February 13.
If the violent clashes following the invasion of Goma by a militia unofficially supported by Rwanda seem not to have posed an obstacle to this international transfer, the domestic transfer project between Lwiro and the capital – which raised indignation in January, as reported by the local press and by the Point – has not been able to succeed to date either.
However, this center of primates located on the front line in the ongoing conflict (150 kilometers by road from Goma) is not the only one concerned by the risk of seeing its protégés escape it.
“Rehabilitate” Congolese zoos
Consulted by GEO, an official press release from the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN) reports a program of “rehabilitation” of the zoological and botanical gardens in Kinshasa and Kisangani (to the northeast), intended to receive new “specimens” whose origin is explicit: sanctuaries, rehabilitation centers and animal parks, “public and private.”
The country currently has three rehabilitation centers and sanctuaries housing chimpanzees and small monkeys (Lwiro, JACK and P-WAC) as well as a sanctuary collecting bonobos (Lola Ya Bonobo) and another housing gorillas (GRACE). However, according to the management of a sanctuary concerned, whose identity we will not mention, the situation is “more than delicate”. “With the political situation, we are taking a back seat”, laments our source.
If the Kinshasa and Kisangani zoos do not seem to have either the required personnel or the financial resources to take care of primates from shelters, the ICCN is also suspected to reserve a completely different fate for the latter. The local press had thus raised the hypothesis of the sale of animals to “foreign firms” (7sur7.cd).
Chimpanzees photographed at Kisangani Zoo, Democratic Republic of CongoEAGLE Network
The trail of an Indian billionaire
According to the NGO EAGLE, the chimpanzees sent to India are “supposed to be routed to the Greens Zoological Rescue and Rehabilitation Center (GZRRC)”, known to the public as Vantara. A project financed by Indian multi-billionaire Mukesh Ambani, CEO of the giant petrochemicals Reliance Industries, with the ambition to make it the largest zoo in the world.
“Could ICCN’s decision to quickly collect great apes for Congolese zoos be linked to the fact that the GZRRC can easily obtain primates through transfers between zoos?”, the association already wondered in a press release published on February 10, just before being informed of the actual sending of chimpanzees to Asia.
Built on an oil refinery site, Vantara was investigated by the independent media outlet Himal (March 20, 2024), revealing in particular transactions with dubious organizations to fill its enclosures. His lions, for example, come from a South African establishment known for breeding wild animals intended for “canned hunting”, a controversial practice of trophy hunting in a closed environment.
Few images of this place have filtered out… at least until its inspiration, a certain Anant Ambani – youngest son of the richest man in Asia – made the zoo the setting for his “pre-wedding” party in March 2024. Some guests, including celebrities, then posed with a captive elephant and shared their photos on social networks.
Ivanka Trump posing in front of an elephant at Anant Ambani’s pre-wedding party, held at this Indian billionaire’s son’s zoo in March 2024. Although the publication still exists, this photo seems to have been deleted. Screenshot
The hidden side of animal trafficking
To try to understand the threat that could weigh on primates in Congolese sanctuaries, we contacted Cécile Neel, investigator for EAGLE, whose teams work in particular in countries neighboring the DRC. In terms of form, nothing prevents the Indian billionaire from signing a contract with the authorities to legally recover primates from Congolese zoos.
“What we know at this stage is that the (Indian) zoo has already received primates from the DRC, and that it has approval allowing it to carry out exchanges with other zoos”, summarizes Cécile Neel. However, such transactions can also be a way, she explains to GEO, to “launder” the real origin of wild animals.
“We’ve had the case of one before of a bonobo found in Armenia, whose CITES permit (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) indicated Guinea as the country of origin”, she illustrates, “which is obviously impossible, since bonobos only live in the DRC.”
The EAGLE network, whose Togolese branch recently seized around forty monkeys from the DRC and destined for Thailand, notes that victims are often drugged to be hidden in cages among other animals. A treatment that not all survives.
The Indian animal park already has received this year nearly thirty chimpanzees from the United Arab Emirates – “an important crossroads for trafficking in protected species” – as well as a bonobo which could come from Iraq, identified the investigator based on data from the CITES.
A dangerous precedent
On the DRC side, concern is palpable. The repopulation of zoos as envisaged by the Congolese institute would in fact constitute, to Cécile Neel’s knowledge, a first on the African continent. And would therefore create, according to her, a dangerous precedent.
Despite the attention paid to each of their protégés, as well as the time and funds devoted to their well-being in the perspective of a reintroduction in the natural environment, should the managers of the shelters concerned fear seeing the services in charge of the transfer ring their doorbell?
“If some think that given the current political situation, no one will come due to lack of logistical means, it is possible on the contrary that the threat will go unnoticed and that the project will be implemented”, fears one of them.
“Our closest cousins are threatened with extinction by trafficking and corruption, and now our investigations show that Congo’s orphaned great apes who survived their family’s massacre are once again under imminent threat from the same enemy”, said Ofir Drori, director and founder of the EAGLE network, in the recent press release.
Trafficking of African primates from Africa to Asia was thwarted with confiscated animals repatriated and sent to accredited PASA member sanctuary
December 28, 2023 – A few days before the year 2023 comes to an end and shortly before Christmas, a PASA* member sanctuary in the southern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), J.A.C.K., welcomed the arrival of rescued monkeys seized in Togo. The animals were confiscated from an enforcement operation earlier this month in West Africa when Togo authorities in collaboration with wildlife investigation organization EAGLE Network intercepted 40 monkeys illegally trafficked from DRC and destined for Thailand. It was the largest international seizure of monkeys in Africa. Two monkeys were found dead in their crate by the enforcement officers in Togo. On December 22nd, the surviving monkeys were welcomed to J.A.C.K. Sanctuary in Lubumbashi, DRC.
This is the second large-scale international primate rescue of J.A.C.K in recent years. Two years ago, J.A.C.K. received 23 monkeys that were smuggled from DRC and intercepted in Zimbabwe following a wildlife enforcement operation and joint repatriation effort between the Zimbabwean and DRC governments, local conservation organizations, and PASA. Currently, J.A.C.K. is caring for more than 80 monkeys of various species that have been rescued from the domestic and international illegal trade.
Co-founder and president of J.A.C.K. Franck Chantereau said, “We appreciate the collaboration between the Togo and DRC governments who promptly repatriated the animals within days upon their seizure. It was like a Christmas miracle for these vulnerable monkeys, some as young as four months old, that have found a safe haven at our sanctuary right before the holiday season. The sudden influx of such a large number of animal arrivals is a challenging task for us, but when so many lives are at stake and depend on us, we must do all that we can to bring wildlife criminals to justice and provide high quality care for the rescued animals.”
Chantereau continued, “We are grateful for the support from organizations and individual donors who help us through this difficult time, juggling between building new enclosures and administering urgent medical care for these newly rescued animals. While the enforcement operation has successfully concluded, the hard work has just begun when our sole mission is to nurse the rescued animals back to good health.”
The traffickers produced CITES permits with fraudulent information, falsely stating the species and number of the animals being smuggled. The traffickers crammed the animals in inhumane, stressed, and unsanitary conditions, leading to the deaths of several monkeys during transport while the remaining were injured or in poor condition. The commingling of the dead monkeys with numerous injured ones destined for long transport – from DRC in Central Africa to Togo in West Africa with the final destination in Thailand – raises serious international public health concerns about potential zoonotic disease spillover. Had this smuggling attempt not been stopped in Togo, these injured animals could have been disseminated in Thailand and the dead animals tossed away by traffickers without proper health safety measures.
Most of the rescued monkeys that have arrived at J.A.C.K. are of species threatened with extinction such as Black mangabeys, L’hoest monkeys, Hamlyn’s monkey, and lesulas, which were only recently discovered and can only be found in the DRC. The confiscated monkey species come from different parts of DRC indicating a coordinated and deliberate network to capture a variety of species for international demand. The poaching of these monkeys from the wild represents a threat to biodiversity of the Congo basin and shows a disturbing trend in the ongoing exploitation of vulnerable primate species due to demand for exotic pets or for unscrupulous public display.
Iris Ho, Head of Campaigns and Policy of PASA said, “This largest international seizure of primates in Africa unfortunately is not surprising to us. It is indicative of the enormous challenge facing our three members in the DRC who have rescued more great apes and monkeys this year than ever before. Our members across Africa occupy an invaluable role in wildlife conservation by being a reliable partner of law enforcement and conservation partners when confiscations of live animals occur and providing them a caring home.”
PASA and J.A.C.K. appreciate the ongoing investigation by the Congolese wildlife authority, Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (ICCN), and will continue to liaise with the ICCN leadership to ensure that the traffickers are brought to justice soonest. We will also continue to collaborate with ICCN to undertake conservation activities to address the root cause of poaching and wildlife trafficking of live animals in the country and to assist the government to effectively comply with international conservation measures such as the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
*Pan African Sanctuary Alliance (PASA) is the largest network of wildlife rescue centers and sanctuaries in Africa with 23 member sanctuaries in 13 African countries. www.pasa.org
Editor’s note: This article by Tracy Keeling makes some important points about increasing great ape trafficking and what CITES should be doing about it.
Opportunity knocks for wildlife trade body to step up for great apes. International demand for great apes in the zoo and pet industries is fuelling trafficking, but change could be on the horizon if CITES seizes the moment.
At less than one-year-old, Sana’s future is already partly decided. The tiny female chimpanzee is a trafficking survivor who has irreversible injuries. Due to these impairments, she can’t have babies on her own in the wild, as she will need to deliver by C-section. As studies also show, early trauma can scar chimpanzees throughout their lives. So Sana may grapple with social and emotional issues due to losing her family as an infant.
In other words, Sana has been robbed of a great many things in her short time on Earth. At the sanctuary where she now resides — J.A.C.K Primate Sanctuary (Jeunes Animaux Confisqués au Katanga) in Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) — other young non-human primates have endured similar losses. They also have peers in sanctuaries elsewhere in Africa, with rates of great ape poaching, infant capture, and trafficking attempts, variously growing in several range states since 2020, according to investigative findings published earlier this year.
Chimpanzees, orangutans, gorillas, and bonobos, are all endangered or critically endangered. So the Earth’s dominant great ape — aka humans — needs to respond forcefully to the trafficking problem and other threats going forward.
The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) is holding a Standing Committee meeting between 6 and 10 November. At the event, Liberia is calling on the committee to back new proposals aimed at addressing the trafficking issue, offering some hope that action could be on the horizon.
A disaster
Sana arrived at J.A.C.K, along with Marie, a rescued blue monkey, in early September. They came to the sanctuary just a week before a dismal anniversary. On 9 September 2022, kidnappers snatched three young chimps — César, Monga and Hussein — from J.A.C.K in the middle of the night. The youngsters were never to be seen again.
Ransom videos sent by the kidnappers provided the last haunting images their human caretakers have of the chimps. But Franck Chantereau, who runs the sanctuary with his wife Roxane, is determined not to let their memory fade. He circulated a petition in the lead up the anniversary, urging people to sign it in an attempt “to keep their memory alive.”
“It is just a disaster and it seems that the world is not taking paying enough attention to the problem,“ he says. “I don’t know what is going to be left honestly in the next five to 10 years.”
The Pan African Sanctuary Alliance’s (PASA) head of campaigns and policy, Iris Ho, paints a similar dire picture. PASA is a coalition of sanctuaries, wildlife centres, and other partners, that works to protect Africa’s primates. It has 23 members located in 13 African countries.
Ho says that she was aware of 27 young chimp and bonobo rescues in the DRC alone this year by mid-September, while wildlife trade investigator Daniel Stiles warns that trafficking of infant gorillas picked up in recent months. The situation is certainly at crisis levels in central Africa, according to Ho, with the same being true to some extent in west Africa.
Stiles authored a report titled “Empty Forests: How politics, economics and corruption fuel live great ape trafficking” in April. Produced by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime (GI-TOC), it pointed to a surge in international demand for live African apes in recent decades.
Moreover, the organisations and entities meant to control illegal trade in great apes “are failing to do so,” according to the report.
Legal trade in apes
CITES has an integral role to play in addressing the issue of trafficking. It is the treaty body that regulates the international trade in many wild species, including great apes.
The body has three different appendices for species, depending on their known risk of extinction. Trade restrictions and permitting requirements for each appendix vary accordingly.
When the necessary criteria is met, non-commercial trade can be permitted for other defined purposes, such as zoos, circuses, and reintroduction to the wild.
CITES Wildlife TradeView records show that countries reported importing 188 live great apes as “direct” trade between 2016 and 2021. Direct trade refers to animals imported straight from their country of origin. Most of the apes were alleged to be bred or born in captivity and the transactions included some individuals listed as traded for commercial purposes.
Legal pathways for illegal trade
The existence of a legal trade in endangered species can provide avenues for illegal trade to happen. This appears to be the case with great apes, according to the GI-TOC report findings.
The report said that captive wildlife facilities involving great apes may operate as both breeding outfits and private zoos, with the latter seeing a massive proliferation in recent years. It further asserted that certain “captive wildlife facilities are increasingly acting as centres for laundering wild-caught animals and illicit trade.”
In comments to National Geographic, Stiles explained, “Registered zoos provide legal cover in the guise of rescue or conservation centers. They also offer laundering facilities for animals smuggled in and sold as captive bred.”
Co-founder of Liberia Chimpanzee Rescue and Protection (LCRP), Jenny Desmond, shares these concerns. LCRP is a rescue centre in Liberia, founded by Desmond and her husband Jimmy, to protect wild and orphaned chimpanzees in the country.
Desmond says, “knowing that sophisticated criminals find creative ways to ensure their supply, the front of ‘sanctuary’ has become a way for traffickers to secure, source, and trade apes without any obstacles.”
Some traders also openly advertise apes on social media platforms, according to the GI-TOC report. It explained, “A video post of a chimpanzee infant dressed in children’s clothing, for example, can quickly reach numerous potential buyers. The trade deals are then negotiated out of public view, in private-messaging apps.”
Abuse of CITES’ captive-bred trade provisions is widespread, according to Monitor Conservation Research Society’s Chris Shepherd. It’s almost always cheaper and easier to capture wild animals than raise individuals in captivity, he says, and there is little meaningful scrutiny of captive breeding claims on the import and export sides of the trading chain.
This means that too often “the parent stock was harvested illegally or the animal that is being imported as captive bred has never been in a captive breeding facility and was directly taken from the wild,” Shepherd argues.
Rooting out illegitimate activity within breeding operations is essential because captivity-based sources make up a significant part of CITES-regulated trade in wild species.
Exporting countries reported more than 120 million direct animal trades by number — referred to as “specimens” — between 2016 and 2021. Over 68% of these specimens, excluding ranched animal trades, were allegedly born or bred in captivity, according to the body’s records. These figures include trade in various specimens, such as blood and tissue, skins, eggs, and other body parts or products derived from animals.
For direct trade in solely live individuals reported by number, captive births and breeding accounted for around 55% of the over 36 million animal trades that exporters reported during the period.
Countries also report trade in animals using other measures, such as kilograms, litres, and metres, so the above figures do not represent the entirety of trade in animals during the period.
Commercial zoos
Zoos were the destination for most traded live great apes in the CITES records. This industry enjoys its own purpose of trade category, separate to the commercial classification.
That zoos can be commercial entities is in no doubt. Indeed, the CITES Secretariat communicated by email that while some CITES parties use the Z code for all zoo imports, others use the T code in some instances. The Secretariat oversees the working of the Convention.
The EMS brief also highlighted examples whereby exporters variously utilised the Z code and the T code in sales of species to the same captive breeding facility, a disconnect that should raise alarm bells.
EMS suggested that determinations on whether captive wildlife facilities fall into the zoo or commercial category should partly depend on their financial activities and what they subject the animals to, such as using them in performances.
At a Standing Committee meeting in November, which is made up of country delegates representing various regions, CITES will take stock of its efforts to protect great apes.
It will review a report on great ape conservation and trade prepared by the Secretariat. The report contains recommendations that encourage parties to improve enforcement measures, collaboration, information gathering, and conservation.
Meanwhile, Liberia has submitted proposals to curb illegal trade in African apes for the committee to consider. It is asking the committee to recommend them for adoption at CITES’ next conference of the parties — CoP20 — which will take place in 2025. The committee decides matters by consensus or vote.
LCRP’s Desmond says Liberia has the world’s second largest population of western chimpanzees, along with the largest intact habitat for the species. She highlights that though national laws exist to protect them, “chimpanzees are under siege in Liberia with a loss of [an] estimated 10% of our population in the past 10 years solely through the rampant bushmeat and pet trades.”
Desmond adds, “Chimpanzee trafficking is local, regional and global. It is an immense and urgent situation. Regional and international collaboration, coordination, oversight, and shared intelligence are the only way we can combat this devastating crisis.”
Liberia’s proposals include calling for the creation of an African Great Apes Task Force. CITES has targeted task forces for other groups of species, such as big cats, and established one for apes in the past.
Having a dedicated task force for African apes would enable CITES to review and improve upon its existing commitments.
For instance, one of the CITES parties’ existing commitments is strengthening “anti-smuggling measures at international borders”. Despite this, the GI-TOC report asserted that apes are often trafficked across borders – mainly by air – with China, the UAE, and increasingly Libya, among the key ultimate destinations. The apes may be concealed in shipments of other species, using mislabelled documents, it said.
J.A.C.K’s Chantereau suggests the failure of countries to stop trafficked animals getting through borders could be addressed by involving experts in the identification process at customs. He also says that a wider rollout of electronic permits in CITES, which still largely uses a paper-based permitting system, would greatly help to reduce the use of fraudulent paperwork.
A task force could dedicate attention to these sorts of issues, along with the suspected abuse of CITES’ other relevant processes, and more.
PASA’s Ho cautiously hopes the discussions at the meeting will lead to some progress after great apes were largely left off the agenda at CITES’ last conference of the parties – CoP19 — in 2022. This omission, along with the Standing Committee failing to back prior suggestions aimed at ensuring apes receive focused attention, has left them somewhat “out of sight, out of mind,” Ho says.
Holistic action
Liberia’s submission also outlines other commitments that the Standing Committee could recommend for adoption at the next CITES CoP.
These include building databases of known captive and wild apes, using artificial intelligence technology and DNA, for better detection of the origin of trafficked individuals. Databases exist to detect wildlife crime in other instances, such as the DNA database built to tackle rhino poaching.
In addition, Liberia proposes the development of strategies to ensure that ape sanctuaries meet high operational standards.
Naturally, meaningful oversight of captive care facilities would be necessary to enforce high standards, which Desmond suggests could help to thwart the laundering of great apes by illegitimate operators.
More broadly, she says high standards are critical for the welfare of individuals and to ensure that genuine sanctuaries meet the “larger responsibility” they have, namely safeguarding endangered species.
Rescue centres do this by helping individuals in their care to “recover, thrive, learn natural behaviors, live with others of their kind, retain their languages, cultures, and genetic diversity, and so much more.” In turn, what rescued apes teach their caretakers informs global conservation efforts and “feasible future reintroduction of great apes” to the wild will rely on these populations.
“Standards of welfare and care become even more important when we consider both the individual and the species,” says Desmond.
Illicit trade in great apes is linked to deforestation and habitat loss, along with people’s livelihoods, Ho highlights, so collaboration across MEAs is important. Deforestation makes it easier for traffickers to access great apes in their forest homes, while habitat loss can push wild apes closer to human communities. Add in insufficient livelihoods and high consumer demand and it’s a perfect storm for trafficking.
Relatedly, another of Liberia’s suggestions calls for establishing projects with relevant communities focused on sustainable livelihoods and habitat restoration.
In a further recommendation, Liberia calls for supporting range states in preventing and mitigating zoonotic diseases, via their One Health Program. As the COVID-19 pandemic made clear, the wildlife trade poses a considerable risk of diseases being transmitted from other animals to humans and vice-versa. This is a threat to people and wildlife, which the holistic ‘one health’ approach seeks to address.
Villains and heroes
The GI-TOC report spotlights corruption as another major mountain to climb in tackling great ape trafficking. Corruption is an issue as old as (human) time and not one that is easily surmountable. But for as long as the world has had villains, it’s also had heroes. Thankfully, there is no shortage of the latter in the great ape trafficking situation either.
From communities and rangers that ensure apes are safe in their homes, through to rescuers and legitimate sanctuaries that liberate and nurture survivors, many champions exist. As Chantereau puts it, “you have heroes in Africa who are risking their lives trying to protect the last great apes.”
The surviving infant apes are also heroic, as are their families who perished trying to protect them.
Mpo’s story illustrates this well. When the young chimp was seized from traffickers, he was still clutching hair of a family member, presumably his mother. He ultimately let the hair go to take food from his rescuer, which Chantereau characterised as Mpo ‘choosing to survive.’
Summing up the courage to go on in the face of these young apes’ trauma is no small feat. Chantereau says when the sanctuary receives an orphan like Mpo, “you can look at him and, in his eyes, you can see he has lost everything. You can see he is empty.”
But very, very slowly, these young apes can gain in confidence and begin to trust their human caretakers. After all they’ve suffered at the hands of humans, through both exploitation and inaction, Chantereau says “they still have the grace to forgive us.”
Editor’s note: This article by Rachel Nuwer is based on the Global Initiative’s ‘Empty Forests’ report on illegal great ape trade. PEGAS has added a photo and links.
With baby gorillas fetching up to $550,000, the illicit trade is booming as demand for African great apes rises in China, the Middle East, and Pakistan.
BY RACHEL NUWERPUBLISHED MAY 9, 2023
Chimpu, a chimpanzee rescued from a smuggling operation in 2017, receives care at Central Zoo, in Kathmandu, Nepal. Two years later in a high-profile case, a Nepali court convicted five men of trafficking baby chimpanzees. [see https://freetheapes.org/tag/seized-chimpanzee/ PHOTOGRAPH BY SAMANTHA REINDERS, THE NEW YORK TIMES/REDUX
Great apes in Africa face the severe threats of habitat destruction and poaching for bushmeat. Now, they’re also increasingly targeted to supply international demand for pets and zoo attractions, according to a new report published by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. So far this problem has largely escaped the notice of most groups tasked with protecting Africa’s great apes: chimpanzees, bonobos, and two species of gorillas.
All four species are endangered—most critically—and are protected by national and international laws. But few groups or governments track ape seizures, making it difficult to know how serious a threat poaching for the live animal trade poses. Circumstantial evidence suggests the problem is significant and growing, says Daniel Stiles, an independent wildlife trade investigator in Kenya who authored the report.
“International policymakers, conservation organizations, and donor governments have not grasped the staggering extent of the illegal trade in African great apes,” says Iris Ho, head of campaigns and policy at the Pan African Sanctuary Alliance (PASA), a nonprofit coalition of 23 primate sanctuaries in 13 African countries, who was interviewed for the report.
Working with a network of undercover investigators and informants, Stiles found that advertisements for live baby great apes are on the rise on WhatsApp and social media. Since 2015, he documented 593 ads for great apes posted by 131 individuals in 17 countries. Prices for the animals have quadrupled compared to a decade ago, with chimps now selling for up to $100,000, bonobos for up to $300,000, and gorillas for up to $550,000. The new report doesn’t cover orangutans, which live in Malaysia and Indonesia.
Most of the African apes go to China, Pakistan, Libya, or the Gulf States—especially the United Arab Emirates—where they become pets or, increasingly, attractions at private zoos. Some 10,000 zoos opened in China between 2013 and 2020, nearly doubling the total number, Stiles reports. It’s easier for locally registered zoos to obtain import permits for strictly protected species than it is for individual citizens, which helps explain zoos’ proliferation. “Registered zoos provide legal cover in the guise of rescue or conservation centers,” Stiles says. “They also offer laundering facilities for animals smuggled in and sold as captive bred.”
In most countries, once a wildlife facility is registered with local authorities, he adds, “you can call them zoos, rescue or conservation centers, sanctuaries—whatever you want.”
Private wildlife facilities offer laundering facilities for animals smuggled in and sold as captive bred. [Photo added by PEGAS]
Another sign of increasing demand is the escalating number of young apes taken in by PASA-accredited wildlife sanctuaries in Africa since 2019, Ho says. PASA sanctuaries look after more than 1,100 chimpanzees, the majority confiscated from traders. Rescued young apes require permanent care, but most PASA sanctuaries are already operating at capacity, and all are underfunded.
Stiles found that traders mainly source baby apes from the Democratic Republic of Congo and West African countries, especially Guinea. For every kidnapped baby chimp, poachers usually kill six to seven adults. Experts also estimate that five to 10 babies die from injuries, illness, or mistreatment for every animal that makes it to buyers abroad.
Traders smuggle some great apes out of Africa in legal shipments of monkeys or birds, the report notes. Increasingly, though, animals are brought to registered zoos, including in South Africa. Evidence suggests that these facilities obtain legal export permits for wild-caught great apes by falsely claiming the animals were bred in captivity.
‘I was tired of battling the bureaucracy’
Little is being done to stop this new trend in illegal trade, Stiles writes, in part because three of the most important international groups tasked with protecting great apes have yet to pay serious attention to the problem.
The Great Apes Survival Partnership (GRASP)—a United Nations alliance—includes combating illegal trade among its priorities. But according to Doug Cress, GRASP’s former leader, the group “barely functions anymore.” Cress resigned in 2016 because the UN agencies that were supposed to be supporting the effort never treated it as a priority, he says. “I was tired of battling the bureaucracy.”
Johannes Refisch, who took over GRASP’s leadership, says that “halting illegal trade is a priority.” Refisch pointed to an ape seizure database that GRASP launched in 2016 as the group’s “main instrument to better understand the drivers of illegal trade so that we can help address it effectively.”
Stiles says that when he requested access to GRASP’s database, in August 2022, he received “a ridiculous report” containing a table of seizure numbers that had no details attached about locations or dates, and no citations. “It had no data,” he says. “Totally useless.”
Refisch declined National Geographic’s request to view the database.
The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the global authority on endangered species, is home to an expert group dedicated to great apes, but it doesn’t prioritize illegal trade, according to Stiles. This stands in contrast to IUCN specialist groups for different species, which actively report on illegal trade. “Look at pangolins,” Stiles says. “No one even knew what the heck a pangolin was until the IUCN specialist group started reporting and saying, ‘Hey, we’ve got tens of thousands of pangolins being trafficked’—and now it’s a big deal.”
“The IUCN,” says Dirck Byler, of the organization’s Primate Specialist Group, “considers all threats to great ape populations as serious, and many of its members have dedicated their professional careers to reducing or reversing the threats to great apes, including efforts to reduce the illegal ape trade.”
CITES, the global treaty to ensure that international wildlife trade doesn’t threaten the survival of species, lacks a working group dedicated to great apes, Stiles reports. At last year’s CITES conference, where representatives from 183 countries and the European Union met to make decisions about trade in endangered species, great apes weren’t even included on the agenda. “Because this trade is international, it falls under the purview of CITES,” Stiles says. “But CITES is not taking action.” [see https://freetheapes.org/2017/12/03/cites-again-ignores-great-apes/%5D
Ben Janse Van Rensburg, chief of the enforcement unit at the CITES Secretariat, says that individual countries are responsible for making sure trade in protected species remains legal. In cases where concerns are raised, he says, the Secretariat “has issued a statement to provide factual background.”
CITES member countries are also responsible for setting the agenda for discussion at conferences and meetings, he says, and for establishing working groups for specific species.
Stiles counters in his report that representatives from Niger, Ivory Coast, Kenya, and Uganda did attempt to create a CITES working group dedicated to great apes, in 2014 and 2016. But these requests, he says, were “refused” by the CITES representative chairing the meeting.
Iris Ho adds that in March 2022 Gabon, supported by Senegal, Guinea and Nigeria, requested—to no avail—that great apes be put on the agenda for the CITES conference later in the year. She says the U.S. also emphasized the importance of paying attention to this issue.
Without concerted global action, the problem will only worsen, Stiles warns. Already, he’s seeing signs that great ape trade is spreading to India. “If the international community does not begin to take great ape trafficking seriously, it will continue to grow, threatening the very survival of our closest relatives,” he says.
PEGAS has obtained the inside story of a joint Thai police and Freeland sting on a major wildlife trafficking network operating in South East Asia.
In police custody after the sting.
The Bangkok Post reported on 24th December that two baby orangutans had been seized and a trafficker arrested in Bangkok. The press report and a video story put out by the Associated Press stated that undercover police officers had arranged to buy the babies using a mobile phone app, but according to an anonymous source who wishes to be called ‘Nick’, the operation was much more complicated than the initial stories suggested.
“I live in Phuket,” Nick told PEGAS, referring to an island in the south of Thailand. “One day I and my partner Jeffrey visited the Phuket Zoo. We saw these two adorable baby orangutans there. The zookeeper let us hold them and have our photos taken with them. We just fell in love with them.”
Nick and Jeffrey hired an agent to find them two infant orangutans that they could buy as pets. The agent found what they were looking for on the Instagram account of a notorious wild animal trafficker, known to PEGAS first as @exoticpet88 and later as @exoticpetworld. Both accounts have now been closed as the owner has gone into hiding.
“He said his name was Tom,” Nick told PEGAS. “He was so polite, always saying ‘sir’ when he addressed me.”
This Instagram account advertised hundreds of exotic species for sale, many CITES Appendix I, which prohibits such commercial trade.
Exoticpetworld replaced exoticpet88. These are the two orangutans that were eventually seized in the Bangkok sting.
Tom sent Nick several photos of the babies using WhatsApp.
Tom asked USD 20,000 for the two orangutan babies. Nick agreed.
The trafficker arrested.
More to come after the Thai police conclude their investigations.
This article was published in Mongabay.com on 10th May 2016. https://news.mongabay.com/2016/05/great-ape-trafficking-expanding-extractive-industry/
There are two main uses to which trafficked young apes are put: as pets or as attractions in commercial wildlife facilities (such as disreputable zoos, safari parks, circuses, hotels and use as photo-props).
The trade is facilitated by celebrities who pose with great ape pets in the press or in social media posts, which act as advertisements that say that owning an ape is “cool.”
Stiles has been investigating great ape trafficking for the past three years, since being invited to be a co-author of the United Nations report Stolen Apes, released in March 2013 at the 16th CITES Conference of the Parties in Bangkok.
Today his name is Manno and we believe he recently turned four years old, though he is small for his age. Manno has bright, inquisitive eyes, has a penchant for pumpkin seeds and loves to run and play. He has been living alone as the solitary chimpanzee in a small, private zoo in Duhok, Kurdistan, in northern Iraq for about three years.
“Manno turned up in 2013 with wildlife dealers in Damascus, Syria, as a traumatized baby orphan,” Spencer Sekyer told me. Spencer, a teacher in Canada, volunteered to help animals kept in the Duhok Zoo in Kurdistan in late 2014. He fell in love with Manno. “His mother was no doubt killed for bushmeat somewhere in Central Africa and the poachers sold him off to animal traffickers.”
Spencer has been trying to get Manno freed for over a year now.
Spencer showed me a colored piece of paper with prices written on it. “The owner of the Duhok Zoo paid US$15,000 for Manno, and the little chimpanzee has repaid the investment by becoming a very popular attraction. People come from all over the Duhok area to play and have their photographs taken with Manno… spending money.”
The zoo owner dresses the little chimpanzee up in children’s clothes and visitors shower him with food and drink that kids like — junk food. This probably explains why Manno is small for his age.
Manno eating pumpkin seeds bought for him by adoring zoo visitors. (Photo: Spencer Sekyer)
Two chimpanzees captured in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Manno very likely endured this before being smuggled to Syria. (Photo courtesy of the Jane Goodall Institute)
If Manno stays in the zoo, the day will come when he stops being cuddly and playful. He will grow in strength and in aggressiveness, as is normal with chimpanzees. If he is not caged up permanently first, he will attack and no doubt seriously injure someone. His future is not bright.
No bright future
In fact, the future is not bright for any great ape that is trafficked. There are two main uses to which young apes are put: as pets or as attractions in commercial wildlife facilities (such as disreputable zoos, safari parks, circuses, hotels and use as photo-props).
The trade is facilitated by celebrities who pose with great ape pets in the press or in social media posts, which act as advertisements that say that owning an ape is “cool”. The coordinator of the United Nations Great Ape Survival Partnership, Doug Cress, warned that celebrities do not realize that many of the apes were obtained illegally.
“These pictures are seen by hundreds of millions of fans, and it sends the message that posing with great apes — all of which are obtained through illegal means, and face miserable lives once they grow too big and strong to hold — is okay as long as it’s cute. But it’s not. It’s illegal, and it contributes to the destruction of already endangered species,” Cress told The Guardian newspaper.
Paris Hilton holding an infant orangutan in Dubai, a known wildlife smuggling center. Photos like this on social media create the impression that it is trendy to keep ape pets. Photo via Instagram.
I have been investigating great ape trafficking for the past three years, since being invited to be a co-author of the United Nations report “Stolen Apes,” released in March 2013 at the 16th CITES Conference of the Parties in Bangkok. The report documents an alarming situation in which more than 1,800 cases were registered of trafficked chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans being lost to the forests of Africa and Asia between 2005 and early 2012.
This is only a fraction of the real number, as documented cases are those involving seizures by the authorities, and the vast majority of incidents go undetected. More tragically, for every live ape that enters the trade, at least one — the mother — and more than ten can be killed as collateral damage. The number lost is multiplied again because many infants die before reaching the intended destination.
I’ve traveled to West and Central Africa, the Middle East, and most recently made a trip to Thailand, Vietnam, and China, gathering information on this 21st century slave trade. I have also been discovering and monitoring a growing network of online wildlife traffickers, who post photos of their prized wildlife acquisitions and those for sale on social media sites. Unfortunately, recent publicity naming those involved in the illegal trade has resulted in them closing Instagram and Facebook accounts and going underground.
Publishing the names of online traffickers simply drives them underground where they can no longer be easily monitored. Composite of images found on Instagram.
Great apes are becoming increasingly expensive. Of a trade in December last year, Patricia Trichorache from the Cheetah Conservation Fund told me, “Right now there are two baby chimps about to be shipped to Dubai … $40,000 each.” An owner flaunting a $40,000 pet on Facebook or Instagram gains instant prestige. It is common to see friends’ posts saying, “I want one sooo bad,” followed by a string of heart emojis.
Dealers also use social media sites to market their wares. The usual routine is to move to the encrypted WhatsApp or Snapchat to conduct the negotiations after the initial contact is made on a photo post.
Traffickers commonly post apes for sale online to solicit buyers. Image via Instagram.
In the Gulf countries, infant chimpanzees and orangutans are commonly dressed up in designer clothes, made to wear sunglasses and baseball caps to look cool, and are fed junk food and taught to smoke. I’ve even seen chimpanzees, orangutans, gibbons, and lion cubs all playing together in videos posted on Instagram. Sometimes the play goes too far and the little apes are terrorized, which only elicits laughter from the owner and his friends who gather in carpeted livingrooms to watch the “fun.”
The typical road a slave-ape takes in a commercial zoo or safari park starts with being used as a photo prop. When they get older they are usually trained to perform in some kind of entertainment show and after they reach puberty they are caged up to become a zoo attraction and to breed. Increasingly, dealers and zoos are breeding their own animals.
In Thailand, a large crocodile farm and zoo uses infant chimpanzees and orangutans as photo props, then cages them up for life when they get too old. Photos by Daniel Stiles.
The Egypt excess
Traffickers in Egypt were amongst the first to see the financial advantages in breeding great apes. A woman with dual Egyptian and Nigerian nationality had been trafficking chimpanzees and gorillas out of Kano, in Nigeria, and Guinea since at least the early 1990s, assisted by family members and an Egyptian pediatrician. Two of her clients run holidaymaker hotels in Sharm el Sheikh that used young chimpanzees as photo props with tourists.
Both hotel owners have since the early 2000s established wildlife breeding facilities for great apes and other animals. Chimpanzees and even gorillas are now being smuggled from these breeding centers to other countries in the Middle East and elsewhere. They often go to Damascus first to pick up a CITES re-export permit, which corrupt officials issue for a price, so that they can arrive in the destination country with documentation that makes it look like a legal trade.
A baby chimpanzee from one of the Egyptian breeding facilities was seized in the Cairo airport last year during the security check, being smuggled to Kuwait, where infant great apes are in high demand.
Dina Zulfikar, a well known Egyptian animal welfare activist, followed the case of little Doodoo, as they named him. Dina told me, “The authorities did not follow procedure. They let the trafficker go and did not file a case with the police, as the law requires.” This is an all too typical story in countries with lax law enforcement.
Poor Doodoo now languishes in the Giza Zoo in precarious conditions. Dina recently informed me that his cellmate Bobo died of unknown causes, after another chimpanzee Mouza died some months earlier. The Sweetwaters Chimpanzee Sanctuary in Kenya offered to rescue the little chimpanzee and provide him with lifelong care, but the Egyptian CITES authorities thus far have not responded to the offer. Little Doodoo could join five other chimpanzees at Sweetwaters that were seized in Kenya in 2005 after being refused entry into Egypt, trafficked by the Egyptian-Nigerian woman.
Today Doodoo languishes in a rusting cage because the Egyptian CITES authorities refuse to allow him to go to a proper sanctuary. Sweetwaters Chimpanzee Sanctuary in Kenya has offered to pay all expenses to relocate him there, to join five other chimpanzees that were rescued from Egyptian traffickers in 2005. Photo by Dina Zulfikar.Doodoo with a zoo veterinarian shortly after he was brought to the Giza Zoo. He was found in the carry-on luggage of a trafficker smuggling him to Kuwait. Photo by Dina Zulfikar.
Ian Redmond, head of the U.K.-based Ape Alliance, worked with Dian Fossey and mountain gorillas in the 1980s, before Fossey’s untimely murder, recounted in the film Gorillas in the Mist. I work closely with Ian on the problem of great ape trafficking and he has tried, without success, to rescue the chimpanzees and gorillas held illegally by the Egyptian breeding facilities.
After a visit in 2015 to meet with the great ape breeders in Egypt, Ian told me, “Recent shipments out of Egypt seem likely to be infants bred at G. O.’s [name withheld] facility – if so we are faced with a different problem: essentially, a chimpanzee baby farm where infants are pulled from their mother and bottle-fed to be sold.”
The wildlife breeding facility in Sharm el Sheikh is on the grounds of this hotel. When the author visited it in November 2014 he witnessed the purchase of three addax, loaded in the crate in the back of the pickup truck. Addax are listed as Critically Endangered by IUCN and are CITES Appendix I. No addax are reported exported from Egypt in 2014 or 2015, although 12 are from other countries. Photo by Daniel Stiles.
The situation has been reported to the Secretariat of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), based in Geneva, but they reply that “it is up to the national CITES Management Authority to take action.”
Overlooked Fact
The number of great apes trafficked internationally every year is not large compared to some other species, but when the collateral damage is factored in we are talking about up to 3,000 lives lost from the wild each year, which is close to one percent of the great ape global population.
One important fact is overlooked when simply numbers are used to assess the significance of this extractive industry. Great apes are unlike any other species group. We humans share millions of years of evolutionary history with them and our genetic makeup is surprisingly similar — about 97% with orangutans, 98% with gorillas, and almost 99% with chimpanzees and bonobos. We all belong to the same biological family called Hominidae.
Increasingly, as more behavioral and genetic research is conducted, we are accepting more easily the fact that great apes are very much like humans in so many ways. Just recently, Jane Goodall was quoted as saying, “Chimpanzees taught me how to be a better mother,” indicating just how much great apes are similar to us.
Ian Redmond, who studies ape behavior, says that “Great ape mothers are incredibly protective of their children, which is why they are always killed when poachers go out hunting for infants to sell.”
All hominid mothers are incredibly protective of their children. Photos by GRASP and Daniel Stiles.
Beginning in the 1960s, the National Geographic Society was instrumental in funding the research of the Trimates — Jane Goodall, Dian Fossey, and Birutė Galdikas. These three exceptional women carried out long-term research respectively of chimpanzees, mountain gorillas, and orangutans. They made known to the world the surprising fact that characteristics previously thought of as exclusively human are shared by these intelligent, emotionally sensitive great apes.
The Nonhuman Rights Project, led by attorney Steven Wise, has been leading a mission in the United States “to change the common law status of at least some nonhuman animals from mere ‘things,’ which lack the capacity to possess any legal right, to ‘persons,’ who possess such fundamental rights as bodily integrity and bodily liberty, and those other legal rights to which evolving standards of morality, scientific discovery, and human experience entitle them.”
The project is focusing on freeing captive chimpanzees, because a chimpanzee (and other great apes), as Wise argues, “is a cognitively complex, autonomous being who should be recognized as having the legal right to bodily liberty.”
A documentary film about Wise’s work, Unlocking the Cage, premiered at the Sundance Film Festival in January to a packed house and a standing ovation. It will be shown around the world on HBO in July. This film could very well be the hominid version of Blackfish, the film that brought the suffering of captive killer whales in marine parks to the world’s attention, and which has launched a campaign to halt this appalling practice. Sea World announced recently that it would halt killer whale breeding and phase out its theatrical shows using them.
Wise and his colleagues have been battling in court to free the chimpanzees Tommy, Kiko, Hercules, and Leo from inhumane captivity, and recently they gained a huge victorywhen it was announced that not only Leo and Hercules, but all of the 220 chimpanzees at the University of Louisiana’s New Iberia Research Center, will be freed and sent to a sanctuary. Argentine courts have already ruled that an orangutan named Sandra deserved the basic rights of a “non-human person” and can be freed from a Buenos Aires zoo and transferred to a sanctuary. Likewise, New Zealand and Spain have extended personhood rights to great apes.
Legal systems are increasingly recognizing that it is immoral for nonhuman hominids to be bought and sold, put into captivity and suffer abuse for any reason. Currently, CITES treats great apes like any other animal or plant species. Although classified in Appendix I, which means that commercial trade is prohibited, great apes can be traded for “non-commercial” purposes if they satisfy certain criteria.
Creating exceptions to the prohibition on international trade in great apes tacitly accepts that it is appropriate for humans to own and imprison them. Once in captivity, it is very difficult to monitor whether they are being used for commercial purposes or are being abused in other ways.
Already, hundreds of great apes are being freed in Europe and the U.S. from biomedical research laboratories, and very soon chimpanzees from private commercial zoos in the U.S. will be liberated, due to changes in laws and understanding of the uniqueness of great apes. This is creating a huge problem of where to put them, once liberated. If all commercial wildlife facilities stretching from the Middle East to the Far East are included, it quickly becomes apparent that all great apes cannot be immediately emancipated after changes in law might come into effect.
Chimpanzees are free to roam and socialize as they wish in Sweetwaters Chimpanzee Sanctuary on Ol Pejeta Conservancy in Kenya. Although Sweetwaters can take 30 or more additional chimpanzees, this is not sufficient to handle all those currently held as a result of illegal trade. Photo by Daniel Stiles.
CITES must act
So what is the answer? Change should be planned, gradual, and move in stepped phases. The first step is stopping the illegal trade, which adds every year to the number that eventually will have to be freed. CITES could be instrumental in achieving this, but it is not implementing what needs to be done. Other organizations concerned with great apes also are not doing all that they could be doing. Attempts to strengthen CITES actions to crack down on great ape trafficking at the last CITES Standing Committee meeting in January 2016 were actually undermined by organizations that profess to be helping great apes.
CITES needs to put teeth into the resolution that deals with great apes. There should be a system of registration and monitoring of institutions and individuals that possess great apes, so that new arrivals and movements can be detected. Currently, great apes arrive illegally in countries and are internally transferred and re-exported with little monitoring. Zoo studbooks are often out of date and inaccurate, as my research has found. The CITES Trade Database records only a small fraction of great apes that are traded internationally.
The Orangutan Show at a safari park in the suburbs of Bangkok, Thailand, has been making use of trafficked great apes from Indonesia for years. Thai law prohibits these performances, which include boxing matches, and dozens of orangutans have even been seized and returned to Indonesia, but the safari park replaces them and carries on. There is no system of registration and monitoring in place, which would prevent such abuses. Photos by Daniel Stiles.
Will Manno and others like him ever be freed to live with others of his kind in a sanctuary, enjoying social life, natural vegetation, and security? Will the day ever come when unthinking people will realize that chimpanzees and orangutans are not playthings and objects of entertainment? They are our family members.
As Dame Jane Goodall says, “In what terms should we think of these beings, nonhuman yet possessing so very many human-like characteristics? How should we treat them? Surely we should treat them with the same consideration and kindness as we show to other humans; and as we recognize human rights, so too should we recognize the rights of the great apes.”
Author’s note: All social media photographs in this article are screen shots from accounts open to the public. In May of 2014 I began working with a project funded by the Arcus Foundation called the Project to End Great Ape Slavery — PEGAS for short. The project is sponsored by the Ol Pejeta Conservancy in Kenya and it works in association with the Sweetwaters Chimpanzee Sanctuary. See FreeTheApes.org. I am also Coordinator of the Ape Alliance Great Ape Trade Working Group. I invite readers to visit our page and sign the pledge to never use a great ape as a pet.
Thailand tourist promos advertise the country as the Land of Smiles, because the people are so welcoming and friendly. But a recent visit to Thailand by the head of PEGAS (the Project to End Great Slavery) turned up dozens of great apes that definitely were not in the mood to smile.
PEGAS found chimpanzees, orangutans and a gorilla held captive in appalling conditions, and many were being used in commercial activities such as circus type performances and props in pay-for-play photo sessions with visitors.
Top of the list of great ape horror shows were Safari World, Samut Prakarn Crocodile Farm and Zoo and Pata Zoo. None of these privately owned facilities are strangers to criticism and bad publicity. Many press articles and NGO reports and campaigns have been directed at them. What is surprising is that they continue to operate as if nothing had happened.
Safari World, for example, located less than an hour from downtown Bangkok, puts on a daily Orang Utan Show that gathers large crowds. Seven juvenile orangutans dress up as rock stars and pretend to play instruments while a young female obscenely go-go dances to blared music. Following the music show, orangutans engage in a boxing match, while a very young chimpanzee rushes in and out acting the clown.
Hundreds of people pay to watch captive great apes perform at Safari World.
Where did these apes originate? Not a single one could have been legally imported, according to the CITES Trade Database. Just as important, performances like that are illegal under Thai law. In 2004 the government seized 48 orangutans at Safari World for exactly the same offense and returned them to Indonesia, where they were met at the Jakarta airport by the Indonesian president’s wife.
“We are very happy to get the orangutans back,” Kristiani Yudhoyono said at a ceremony. “They belong to our vast nation…”. Now about ten more orangutans are back at Safari World.
A young chimpanzee plays the clown
In November last year, 14 orangutans confiscated at a Phuket island zoo were repatriated to Indonesia for doing the same things as seen at Safari World. No one was charged with a crime, even though obviously one had been committed.
Edwin Wiek of the Wildlife Friends Foundation Thailand, who was instrumental in having the Phuket orangutans confiscated and repatriated, said in August 2015 that “[the Department of National Parks] decision has sent a clear message to wildlife smugglers and zoos in Thailand that smuggled apes will never end up in the trade again.”
Fourteen orangutans were returned to Indonesia in November 2015. Will it be a deterrent? Photo: Claire Beastall, TRAFFIC
Apparently Safari World and the traffickers who supply them did not receive the message.
The owner of Samut Prakarn Crocodile Farm and Zoo missed the message as well. As soon as visitors enter they encounter baby chimpanzees, orangutans and tigers lined up in cages or cribs, there to be photographed. The zoo charges 200 baht (USD 5.60) for a framed photo with Meiya, a 5-month old female chimpanzee. Commercial use of great apes is supposedly prohibited if they are imported, as they are CITES Appendix I. If they are captive born, the facility must be registered with the government and receive authorization to breed that species, according to Section 17 of the Wild Animal Reservation and Protection Act of 1992. Permission to breed crocodiles does not extend to great apes.
Entering Samut Prakarn Crocodile Farm and Zoo one finds baby great apes kept there to make money in photo sessions
It costs 200 baht to take a photo with Meiya
On the edge of the farm and zoo, away from where the crocodile and elephant shows take place, PEGAS found some rusting cages that housed a pitiful orangutan and several adult chimpanzees. Five were visible and an employee said that eight more were kept in cages out of sight. A recent animal welfare law prohibits cruelty to animals. It unfortunately does not define cruelty. Many would think that cooping up intelligent creatures in such deplorable conditions constitutes cruel imprisonment.
An orangutan and several chimpanzees are kept in old, rusting cages at Samut Prakarn
The last of the terrible three is the infamous Pata Zoo, opened in 1984 on top of a Bangkok department store. Its biggest celebrity inmate is Bua Noi, a female gorilla that according to the International Gorilla Studbook originated in Guinea – a country that has no gorillas. What Guinea does have, however, is a notorious reputation for illegal great ape trade. The CITES Trade Database has no record of a gorilla import from any country to Thailand, thus it appears Bua Noi was illegally acquired. She lives in solitary confinement and tourists have even reported seeing her gripping the cage bars and shedding tears.
Bua Noi exists solely to earn money for the zoo owner
The Pata Zoo also holds five orangutans and three chimpanzees in cramped cages, a long-standing animal welfare issue. It, too, puts on an illegal show, which includes an orangutan that lifts barbells, and young orangutans sit with minders outside waiting for tourists to pay money to have their photo taken with them.
Young orangutans of unknown origin sit outside the Pata Zoo to be used as money earning photo props
PETA Asia claims that “the conditions at the Pata Zoo are some the worst that PETA has ever encountered… The cages are extremely small and barren, and the animals are deprived of everything that is natural and important to them.” PETA has a campaign to close the zoo, but its license was recently renewed, and the zoo director Kanit Sermsirimongkhon said, “We have complied with all relevant laws”. Have they? Bua Noi and other great apes there were probably illegally imported, as they do not have CITES documentation.
PETA Asia has a campaign to close Pata Zoo
PEGAS visited several other zoos in Thailand as well, including Dusit, Lopburi, Khao Kheow and Korat. The seven orangutans and three chimpanzees found at Lopburi were living in dreadful conditions and are being used in illegal performances, but those at the other zoos were situated in well-designed enclosures with landscaping and amenities.
Lopburi Zoo
Lopburi Zoo keeps orangutans in a dark dungeon, except when they bring them out for weekend and holiday shows
In all, PEGAS estimates that there are at least 41 orangutans, 38 chimpanzees and one gorilla in nine facilities. In some, the animals could not be seen at the time of the visit. There are other great apes located in facilities not visited. Judging by records in the CITES Trade Database, some of the apes were probably illegally imported, although some were born in Thailand. Unless the facility has obtained express permission to propagate a species, even locally born apes could be illegal to possess.
Khao Kheow has a pleasant environment for the great apes
But a 6-year old female orangutan is kept outside for the money-making photo sessions
Why can’t the illegal exploitation of these sentient animals be stopped?
Because, as Edwin Wiek says, “It’s big business. Influential people.”
“There are ex-prime ministers that have chimpanzees and orangutans in their backyard. These are the kind of people that are opposing us,” said Wiek.
Just as with the problem of online wildlife traffickers in the Middle East, the solution has to start at the top. If the decision-makers in power are complicit with the crime, little can be achieved. Campaigns need to be directed at those at the very top of government. Only they have the power to change anything.
This article from The Dodo is based on PEGAS work…
By Sarah V Schweig 15 December 2015
Sometimes an exposé reveals a seedy secret world of animal exploitation and makes a huge splash.
And sometimes a dark world of horrific exploitation is hidden in plain sight.
A quick look online reveals a terrifying truth about the lives of orphaned great apes, who are being illegally bought by wealthy people in the Middle East who want to dress them up and keep them as pets.
“Almost all of these animals have been captured as infants from the wild, and been bought online,” the Ol Pejeta Conservancy wrote in a press release provided to The Dodo.
Ol Pejeta has started the Project to End Great Ape Slavery (PEGAS) with support from the Arcus Foundation, which seeks to develop a better understanding of the illegal trade in great apes by investigating websites that advertise apes for sale or display photos and videos of great apes as pets.
PEGAS collected the photographs in this article from online sites open to the public.
All great ape species are listed under Appendix I of CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora), an international agreement that is supposed to ensure that international trade of animals and plants does not threaten their survival. This means that any commercial trade of these animals is illegal.
Illegal — and also horrifically wrong. According to Ol Pejeta:
The demand for great apes as pets, entertainment props, or for display in private zoos in the Middle East is fueling the large scale wild capture of infants in the forests of West Africa and Indonesia. In order to capture young chimpanzees, hunters kill the mothers and often the rest of the troop as well. Many of these infants die en route to their selling destination, as a result of rough handling, cramped transport conditions, stress and dehydration.
One such case was a baby chimp known as Little Doody.
Little Doody was discovered in the Cairo airport being smuggled into a plane bound for Kuwait.
Even though PEGAS offered to relocate him to a sanctuary, the Egyptian CITES office did not respond to the offer.
Little Doody was brought to the Giza Zoo. He now lives in a cage.
Ansoumane Doumbouya, the former Guinea CITES official arrested recently in Conakry for wildlife trafficking using fraudulent CITES permits, also signed permits for the export of bonobos to Armenia in 2011. No bonobos live in West Africa, they are restricted to the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Ofir Drori of EAGLE reports that Doumbouya has been transported to prison to be held for trial. An unsigned blank CITES permit was found in his bag!
The following story published in an Armenian newspaper gives some background and links to earlier stories about great ape imports to Armenia.
Arrest of Guinean Official Implicated in Illegal Animal Trade; Signed Export Permits for Armenia as Well
A bonobo smuggled into Armenia with a Guinea CITES permit
Ansoumane Doumbouya, former head of the CITES Management Authority of Guinea anda key player behind the illegal export of hundreds of chimpanzees and gorillas to China and elsewhere, was arrested on August 21.
EAGLE (Eco Activists for Governance & Law Enforcement) announced the arrest of Ansoumane Doumbouya, along with the infamous wildlife trafficker Thierno Barry, in Conakry, Guinea’s capital.
Hetq has the following CITES export permit, signed by Doumbouya in 2011, under which two bonobo primates were imported by the Zoo Fauna Art company in Armenia.
The CITES export permit signed by Doumbouya
A Hetq investigative series into the illegal animal trade in Armenia led to criminal charges against Zoo Fauna Art owner Artur Khachatryan.
The investigative division of Armenia’s Ministry of Finance has been dragging out an inquiry into the matter for one and a half years.
Even after he lost his position with CITES, Doumbouya retained a position within the Guinean Ministry of Environment as Commander of the national wildlife and forestry mobile enforcement brigade and was still signing CITES permits for traffickers.
Richard Vigne CEO, Ol Pejeta Conservancy Stephen Ngulu Deputy Manager, Ol Pejeta Conservancy Daniel Stiles Project Manager, PEGAS Tom Butynski Director of Research, Sustainability Centre Eastern Africa Alpana Patel Jane Goodall Institute, Kenya Yvonne de Jong Eastern Africa Primate Diversity and Conservation Program, Kenya